Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Streaming Audio Hosting

Radiojar vs Recupy

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Radiojar #4 in Streaming Audio Hosting 8.8/10 Paid ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Radiojar
Recupy #6 in Streaming Audio Hosting 8.6/10 Paid ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Recupy

Radiojar leads on 0 checks, Recupy on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRadiojar · 8.8/10
  • Most featuresRecupy · 3 of 4

Radiojar scores higher on our rubric for streaming audio hosting: 8.8 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

Radiojar is the better fit for stations needing unlimited-listener cloud streaming. Recupy is the better fit for stations needing detailed scheduling and listener data.

  • Radiojar fits best

    Stations needing unlimited-listener cloud streaming

  • Recupy fits best

    Stations needing detailed scheduling and listener data

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Radiojar 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Recupy 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.6
Ranking #4 in Streaming Audio Hosting #6 in Streaming Audio Hosting
Best for Stations needing unlimited-listener cloud streaming Stations needing detailed scheduling and listener data
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price €100/yr $190/yr
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Money-back guarantee 30 days 14 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Mobile, Browser extension
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension
Support Email, Tickets, Docs Email, Phone, Docs
Integrations 3 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Radiojar 0/4 · Recupy 3/4
Live streaming Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Scheduled automation Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Listener analytics Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Recording archive Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Listener limit Not checked yet 500 listeners
Audio quality Not checked yet High
Stream protocols Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Unlimited listeners and listening hours across the published plans
  • Virtual Studio supports live broadcasting and Facebook Live
  • Automation includes playlists, breaks, schedules, and recurring programming
  • Granular scheduling for programs, ads, and jingles
  • Listener analytics cover live counts, history, geography, and sources
  • WebDJ, AutoDJ, podcast publishing, and song requests in one service
Cons
  • Simulcast includes no automation
  • There is no free plan
  • The platform is focused on web and API access
  • Starter supports only 500 concurrent listeners
  • Starter includes one DJ account
  • There is no free plan
Our verdict

Radiojar is a cloud-based management and streaming platform for internet radio stations, FM/AM broadcasters, media groups, music providers, and audio service providers. It combines live broadcasting, automated playout, playlist scheduling,…

Read the review →

Recupy is cloud-based internet radio software for individual broadcasters, community stations, and corporate radio teams. It combines browser-based WebDJ broadcasting with AutoDJ playback, automatic live-stream switchover, scheduling,…

Read the review →
  1. RadiojarStreaming Audio Hosting 8.8Paid
  2. RecupyStreaming Audio Hosting 8.6Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Radiojar — where it wins

    • Unlimited listeners and listening hours across the published plans
    • Virtual Studio supports live broadcasting and Facebook Live
    • Automation includes playlists, breaks, schedules, and recurring programming

    Where it doesn't

    • Simulcast includes no automation
    • There is no free plan
    • The platform is focused on web and API access
  • Recupy — where it wins

    • Granular scheduling for programs, ads, and jingles
    • Listener analytics cover live counts, history, geography, and sources
    • WebDJ, AutoDJ, podcast publishing, and song requests in one service

    Where it doesn't

    • Starter supports only 500 concurrent listeners
    • Starter includes one DJ account
    • There is no free plan

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update