Head-to-head · SSH Clients
PuTTY vs WinSCP
PuTTY leads on 0 checks, WinSCP on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scorePuTTY · 9.0/10
- Free planboth
PuTTY scores higher on our rubric for ssh clients: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.
On session management, WinSCP gives you Workspaces where PuTTY offers Basic.
PuTTY is the better fit for users wanting a proven free SSH client. WinSCP is the better fit for windows users focused on file transfer.
- PuTTY fits best
Users wanting a proven free SSH client
- WinSCP fits best
Windows users focused on file transfer
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | PuTTY 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | WinSCP 8.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Ranking | #3 in SSH Clients | #5 in SSH Clients |
| Best for | Users wanting a proven free SSH client | Windows users focused on file transfer |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Windows |
| Support | Email, Docs | Community, Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market |
| Features PuTTY 2/3 · WinSCP 2/3 | ||
| SFTP support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Port forwarding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team session sharing | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Supported protocols | SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, SUPDUP, raw, serial, SFTP, SCP | SSH, SFTP, SCP, FTP, FTPS, WebDAV, WebDAVS, S3 |
| Supported platforms | Windows and Unix | Windows |
| Session management | Basic | Workspaces |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | PuTTY is a free, open-source client for terminal access, file transfer, and SSH networking. It supports SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, SUPDUP, raw network connections, and serial sessions, making it suitable for users who work across different… Read the review → |
WinSCP is a free, open-source Windows application for moving files between local and remote computers. It is aimed at users who need more than a basic SSH connection: administrators, developers, and technical teams can work with SFTP, SCP,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
PuTTY — where it wins
- Free and open source with SSH, SFTP, SCP, and port forwarding
- Supports public-key authentication, Pageant, proxying, and X11 forwarding
- Includes saved sessions, PSFTP, PSCP, and the Plink command-line client
Where it doesn't
- Session management is basic
- No release-quality Android, iOS, or macOS ports
- Unix support is provided as source code rather than Windows-style executables
WinSCP — where it wins
- Supports SFTP, SCP, FTP, WebDAV, FTPS, WebDAVS, and S3
- Includes directory synchronization, workspaces, scripting, and command-line tools
- Open source with tunneling, port forwarding, and master-password protection
Where it doesn't
- Windows is the only supported platform
- SSH terminal capabilities are less central than in dedicated terminal clients
- No AI features are included
- PuTTY9.0/10 · Free plan
A capable free SSH client with broad protocol support and basic session management.
Visit PuTTYFull verdict → - WinSCP8.8/10 · Free plan
A capable Windows file-transfer tool with SSH support, scripting, and synchronization.
Visit WinSCPFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Tabby vs PuTTY
- Tabby vs WinSCP
- OpenSSH vs PuTTY
- OpenSSH vs WinSCP
- PuTTY vs Solar-PuTTY
- PuTTY vs Tectia SSH Client
- PuTTY vs Termius
- PuTTY vs WindTerm
All SSH clients comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





