Head-to-head · Bandwidth Monitoring Software
Progress Flowmon vs pmacct
Progress Flowmon leads on 0 checks, pmacct on 1, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreProgress Flowmon · 9.0/10
- Free planonly pmacct
- Free trialonly Progress Flowmon
Progress Flowmon scores higher on our rubric for bandwidth monitoring software: 9.0 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.
pmacct offers free plan; Progress Flowmon doesn't.
Progress Flowmon is the better fit for advanced hybrid network observability. pmacct is the better fit for technical teams needing flexible flow accounting.
- Progress Flowmon fits best
Advanced hybrid network observability
- pmacct fits best
Technical teams needing flexible flow accounting
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Progress Flowmon 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | pmacct 8.4/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.4 |
| Ranking | #3 in Bandwidth Monitoring Software | #7 in Bandwidth Monitoring Software |
| Best for | Advanced hybrid network observability | Technical teams needing flexible flow accounting |
| Pricing model | Paid | Free |
| Starting price | Pricing on request · 30-day trial | Free plan |
| Free plan | — | ✓ (best) |
| Free trial | 30 days | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web | Linux |
| Integrations | 9 integrations | 12 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Progress Flowmon 0/4 · pmacct 0/4 | ||
| Application monitoring | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| User monitoring | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| SNMP monitoring | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Bandwidth alerts | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Flow protocol support | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Monitored device limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Historical data retention | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Progress Flowmon is a network and security monitoring platform for NetOps and SecOps teams managing on-premises, cloud and hybrid environments. It collects flow data from infrastructure such as firewalls, routers, switches and cloud… Read the review → |
pmacct is an open-source suite of passive network monitoring and traffic-accounting daemons for network operators and engineers. It collects IPv4 and IPv6 traffic through packet captures, NetFlow, IPFIX, sFlow, NFLOG, BGP, BMP, and… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Progress Flowmon — where it wins
- Ingests NetFlow, IPFIX, sFlow, jFlow, cflowd and NetStream
- Combines traffic, topology, response-time and capacity analysis
- Adds machine learning, packet capture and REST automation
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires contact with Progress or its partner network
- Full packet capture and forensic analysis use separate Flowmon modules
- Its broad feature set may exceed narrower monitoring needs
pmacct — where it wins
- Supports NetFlow, IPFIX, sFlow, packet capture, BGP, BMP, and telemetry
- Combines filtering, sampling, tagging, aggregation, and Layer 7 classification
- Exports to SQL, NoSQL, flat files, Kafka, AMQP, and multiple flow protocols
Where it doesn't
- Linux-only, self-hosted deployment limits platform flexibility
- Broad configuration options require network engineering expertise
- No commercial tiers for teams seeking packaged vendor support
- Progress Flowmon9.0/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial
A broad hybrid monitoring platform for teams needing flow, topology, performance and security analysis.
Try Progress FlowmonFull verdict → - pmacct8.4/10 · Free plan
A flexible, self-hosted toolkit for flow collection, packet accounting, and network-data export.
Visit pmacctFull verdict →
More comparisons
- ntopng vs Progress Flowmon
- ntopng vs pmacct
- ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer vs pmacct
- Progress Flowmon vs Intermapper
- Progress Flowmon vs Cacti
- Progress Flowmon vs NetCrunch
- ElastiFlow vs pmacct
- Intermapper vs pmacct
All bandwidth monitoring software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update




