Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Bandwidth Monitoring Software

Progress Flowmon vs pmacct

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Progress Flowmon #3 in Bandwidth Monitoring Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 4 features Try Progress Flowmon
pmacct #7 in Bandwidth Monitoring Software 8.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit pmacct

Progress Flowmon leads on 0 checks, pmacct on 1, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreProgress Flowmon · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly pmacct
  • Free trialonly Progress Flowmon

Progress Flowmon scores higher on our rubric for bandwidth monitoring software: 9.0 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

pmacct offers free plan; Progress Flowmon doesn't.

Progress Flowmon is the better fit for advanced hybrid network observability. pmacct is the better fit for technical teams needing flexible flow accounting.

  • Progress Flowmon fits best

    Advanced hybrid network observability

  • pmacct fits best

    Technical teams needing flexible flow accounting

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Progress Flowmon 9.0/10 Visit ↗ pmacct 8.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.4
Ranking #3 in Bandwidth Monitoring Software #7 in Bandwidth Monitoring Software
Best for Advanced hybrid network observability Technical teams needing flexible flow accounting
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free plan
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web Linux
Integrations 9 integrations 12 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Progress Flowmon 0/4 · pmacct 0/4
Application monitoring Not checked yet Not checked yet
User monitoring Not checked yet Not checked yet
SNMP monitoring Not checked yet Not checked yet
Bandwidth alerts Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Flow protocol support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Monitored device limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Historical data retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Ingests NetFlow, IPFIX, sFlow, jFlow, cflowd and NetStream
  • Combines traffic, topology, response-time and capacity analysis
  • Adds machine learning, packet capture and REST automation
  • Supports NetFlow, IPFIX, sFlow, packet capture, BGP, BMP, and telemetry
  • Combines filtering, sampling, tagging, aggregation, and Layer 7 classification
  • Exports to SQL, NoSQL, flat files, Kafka, AMQP, and multiple flow protocols
Cons
  • Pricing requires contact with Progress or its partner network
  • Full packet capture and forensic analysis use separate Flowmon modules
  • Its broad feature set may exceed narrower monitoring needs
  • Linux-only, self-hosted deployment limits platform flexibility
  • Broad configuration options require network engineering expertise
  • No commercial tiers for teams seeking packaged vendor support
Our verdict

Progress Flowmon is a network and security monitoring platform for NetOps and SecOps teams managing on-premises, cloud and hybrid environments. It collects flow data from infrastructure such as firewalls, routers, switches and cloud…

Read the review →

pmacct is an open-source suite of passive network monitoring and traffic-accounting daemons for network operators and engineers. It collects IPv4 and IPv6 traffic through packet captures, NetFlow, IPFIX, sFlow, NFLOG, BGP, BMP, and…

Read the review →
  1. Progress FlowmonBandwidth Monitoring Software 9.0Pricing on request · 30-day trial
  2. pmacctBandwidth Monitoring Software 8.4Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Progress Flowmon — where it wins

    • Ingests NetFlow, IPFIX, sFlow, jFlow, cflowd and NetStream
    • Combines traffic, topology, response-time and capacity analysis
    • Adds machine learning, packet capture and REST automation

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contact with Progress or its partner network
    • Full packet capture and forensic analysis use separate Flowmon modules
    • Its broad feature set may exceed narrower monitoring needs
  • pmacct — where it wins

    • Supports NetFlow, IPFIX, sFlow, packet capture, BGP, BMP, and telemetry
    • Combines filtering, sampling, tagging, aggregation, and Layer 7 classification
    • Exports to SQL, NoSQL, flat files, Kafka, AMQP, and multiple flow protocols

    Where it doesn't

    • Linux-only, self-hosted deployment limits platform flexibility
    • Broad configuration options require network engineering expertise
    • No commercial tiers for teams seeking packaged vendor support
  • Progress Flowmon9.0/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A broad hybrid monitoring platform for teams needing flow, topology, performance and security analysis.

    Try Progress FlowmonFull verdict →
  • pmacct8.4/10 · Free plan

    A flexible, self-hosted toolkit for flow collection, packet accounting, and network-data export.

    Visit pmacctFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update