Head-to-head · Bandwidth Monitoring Software
ntopng vs Progress Flowmon
ntopng leads on 1 check, Progress Flowmon on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scorentopng · 9.4/10
- Free planonly ntopng
- Free trialonly Progress Flowmon
ntopng scores higher on our rubric for bandwidth monitoring software: 9.4 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.
ntopng offers free plan; Progress Flowmon doesn't.
ntopng is the better fit for comprehensive self-hosted network visibility. Progress Flowmon is the better fit for advanced hybrid network observability.
- ntopng fits best
Comprehensive self-hosted network visibility
- Progress Flowmon fits best
Advanced hybrid network observability
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | ntopng 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | Progress Flowmon 9.0/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 9.0 |
| Ranking | #1 in Bandwidth Monitoring Software | #3 in Bandwidth Monitoring Software |
| Best for | Comprehensive self-hosted network visibility | Advanced hybrid network observability |
| Pricing model | Free | Paid |
| Starting price | Free | Pricing on request · 30-day trial |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | — | 30 days |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | Web |
| Integrations | 7 integrations | 9 integrations |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features ntopng 0/4 · Progress Flowmon 0/4 | ||
| Application monitoring | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| User monitoring | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| SNMP monitoring | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Bandwidth alerts | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Flow protocol support | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Monitored device limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Historical data retention | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | ntopng is a self-hosted, web-based network traffic monitoring application for network administrators, security teams, and service providers. It combines passive packet capture with NetFlow, sFlow, and IPFIX collection, Layer-7 application… Read the review → |
Progress Flowmon is a network and security monitoring platform for NetOps and SecOps teams managing on-premises, cloud and hybrid environments. It collects flow data from infrastructure such as firewalls, routers, switches and cloud… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
ntopng — where it wins
- Combines packet capture, flow collection, SNMP, application, and topology monitoring
- Open-source Community plan includes real-time visibility, alerts, and discovery
- Supports Linux, Windows, macOS, REST API, and extensive integrations
Where it doesn't
- Self-hosted deployment requires organizations to manage the monitoring environment
- Historical data and reports are limited to Enterprise tiers
- LDAP authentication and network matrix timeseries require the Pro tier
Progress Flowmon — where it wins
- Ingests NetFlow, IPFIX, sFlow, jFlow, cflowd and NetStream
- Combines traffic, topology, response-time and capacity analysis
- Adds machine learning, packet capture and REST automation
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires contact with Progress or its partner network
- Full packet capture and forensic analysis use separate Flowmon modules
- Its broad feature set may exceed narrower monitoring needs
- ntopng9.4/10 · Free plan
A broad self-hosted toolkit for real-time, historical, and infrastructure visibility.
Visit ntopngFull verdict → - Progress Flowmon9.0/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial
A broad hybrid monitoring platform for teams needing flow, topology, performance and security analysis.
Try Progress FlowmonFull verdict →
More comparisons
- ntopng vs Intermapper
- ntopng vs Cacti
- ntopng vs pmacct
- ntopng vs NetCrunch
- Progress Flowmon vs Intermapper
- Progress Flowmon vs Cacti
- Progress Flowmon vs pmacct
- Progress Flowmon vs NetCrunch
All bandwidth monitoring software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update


