Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Bandwidth Monitoring Software

ntopng vs Progress Flowmon

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score ntopng #1 in Bandwidth Monitoring Software 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit ntopng
Progress Flowmon #3 in Bandwidth Monitoring Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 4 features Try Progress Flowmon

ntopng leads on 1 check, Progress Flowmon on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorentopng · 9.4/10
  • Free planonly ntopng
  • Free trialonly Progress Flowmon

ntopng scores higher on our rubric for bandwidth monitoring software: 9.4 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

ntopng offers free plan; Progress Flowmon doesn't.

ntopng is the better fit for comprehensive self-hosted network visibility. Progress Flowmon is the better fit for advanced hybrid network observability.

  • ntopng fits best

    Comprehensive self-hosted network visibility

  • Progress Flowmon fits best

    Advanced hybrid network observability

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature ntopng 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Progress Flowmon 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 9.0
Ranking #1 in Bandwidth Monitoring Software #3 in Bandwidth Monitoring Software
Best for Comprehensive self-hosted network visibility Advanced hybrid network observability
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Free Pricing on request · 30-day trial
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — 30 days
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Integrations 7 integrations 9 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ntopng 0/4 · Progress Flowmon 0/4
Application monitoring Not checked yet Not checked yet
User monitoring Not checked yet Not checked yet
SNMP monitoring Not checked yet Not checked yet
Bandwidth alerts Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Flow protocol support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Monitored device limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Historical data retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Combines packet capture, flow collection, SNMP, application, and topology monitoring
  • Open-source Community plan includes real-time visibility, alerts, and discovery
  • Supports Linux, Windows, macOS, REST API, and extensive integrations
  • Ingests NetFlow, IPFIX, sFlow, jFlow, cflowd and NetStream
  • Combines traffic, topology, response-time and capacity analysis
  • Adds machine learning, packet capture and REST automation
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment requires organizations to manage the monitoring environment
  • Historical data and reports are limited to Enterprise tiers
  • LDAP authentication and network matrix timeseries require the Pro tier
  • Pricing requires contact with Progress or its partner network
  • Full packet capture and forensic analysis use separate Flowmon modules
  • Its broad feature set may exceed narrower monitoring needs
Our verdict

ntopng is a self-hosted, web-based network traffic monitoring application for network administrators, security teams, and service providers. It combines passive packet capture with NetFlow, sFlow, and IPFIX collection, Layer-7 application…

Read the review →

Progress Flowmon is a network and security monitoring platform for NetOps and SecOps teams managing on-premises, cloud and hybrid environments. It collects flow data from infrastructure such as firewalls, routers, switches and cloud…

Read the review →
  1. ntopngBandwidth Monitoring Software 9.4Free plan
  2. Progress FlowmonBandwidth Monitoring Software 9.0Pricing on request · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • ntopng — where it wins

    • Combines packet capture, flow collection, SNMP, application, and topology monitoring
    • Open-source Community plan includes real-time visibility, alerts, and discovery
    • Supports Linux, Windows, macOS, REST API, and extensive integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires organizations to manage the monitoring environment
    • Historical data and reports are limited to Enterprise tiers
    • LDAP authentication and network matrix timeseries require the Pro tier
  • Progress Flowmon — where it wins

    • Ingests NetFlow, IPFIX, sFlow, jFlow, cflowd and NetStream
    • Combines traffic, topology, response-time and capacity analysis
    • Adds machine learning, packet capture and REST automation

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contact with Progress or its partner network
    • Full packet capture and forensic analysis use separate Flowmon modules
    • Its broad feature set may exceed narrower monitoring needs
  • ntopng9.4/10 · Free plan

    A broad self-hosted toolkit for real-time, historical, and infrastructure visibility.

    Visit ntopngFull verdict →
  • Progress Flowmon9.0/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A broad hybrid monitoring platform for teams needing flow, topology, performance and security analysis.

    Try Progress FlowmonFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update