Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Zero Trust Network Access Software

Pomerium vs Portnox ZTNA

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Pomerium #22 in Zero Trust Network Access Software 7.1/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 3 features Visit Pomerium
Portnox ZTNA #23 in Zero Trust Network Access Software 6.9/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Portnox

Pomerium leads on 0 checks, Portnox ZTNA on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorePomerium · 7.1/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Portnox ZTNA
  • Most featuresPortnox ZTNA · 3 of 3

Pomerium scores higher on our rubric for zero trust network access software: 7.1 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #22 and #23.

On access methods, Portnox ZTNA gives you Both where Pomerium offers Browser.

Pomerium is the better fit for open-source and self-hosting teams. Portnox ZTNA is the better fit for security-focused teams wanting session controls.

  • Pomerium fits best

    Open-source and self-hosting teams

  • Portnox ZTNA fits best

    Security-focused teams wanting session controls

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Pomerium 7.1/10 Visit ↗ Portnox ZTNA 6.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.1 6.9
Ranking #22 in Zero Trust Network Access Software #23 in Zero Trust Network Access Software
Best for Open-source and self-hosting teams Security-focused teams wanting session controls
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $7/user/mo Free plan · 30-day trial
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — 30 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
Support Email, Community, Docs Community, Docs · 24/7
Integrations 3 integrations 10 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Pomerium 2/3 · Portnox ZTNA 3/3
Device posture checks ✓ ✓
SIEM log export Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Session recording ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Hybrid
Access methods Browser Both
Private app connectors Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported app protocols HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP/2, HTTP/3, WebSocket, gRPC, TCP, UDP, SSH RDP, SSH, VNC, Telnet
Our review
Pros
  • Open-source deployment with self-hosted proxy and data plane
  • Clientless browser access plus SSH, TCP, UDP, and web protocols
  • Policy-as-code, RBAC, SSO, and continuous context checks
  • Passwordless, certificate-based authentication with continuous posture checks
  • Supports SaaS, private applications, RDP, SSH, VNC, and Telnet
  • Session recording, remediation, audit trails, monitoring, and alerts
Cons
  • Personal Free is limited to 10 users and 10 routes
  • Session recording is available only with Enterprise
  • Platform coverage centers on web, Linux, API, and self-hosted deployments
  • The free version may have different feature scope from paid offerings
  • Private resources require a Docker-based gateway for hosted access
  • It is proprietary rather than open source
Our verdict

Pomerium is an identity-aware Layer 7 reverse proxy for securing access to internal and external applications. It suits teams that need zero trust access without requiring a client for browser-based applications, while also supporting…

Read the review →

Portnox ZTNA is a cloud-native zero trust network access service for teams that need identity-aware, device-aware access to SaaS and private applications. It evaluates user identity, device certificates, and device security posture before…

Read the review →
  1. PomeriumZero Trust Network Access Software 7.1Free plan
  2. Portnox ZTNAZero Trust Network Access Software 6.9Free plan · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Pomerium — where it wins

    • Open-source deployment with self-hosted proxy and data plane
    • Clientless browser access plus SSH, TCP, UDP, and web protocols
    • Policy-as-code, RBAC, SSO, and continuous context checks

    Where it doesn't

    • Personal Free is limited to 10 users and 10 routes
    • Session recording is available only with Enterprise
    • Platform coverage centers on web, Linux, API, and self-hosted deployments
  • Portnox ZTNA — where it wins

    • Passwordless, certificate-based authentication with continuous posture checks
    • Supports SaaS, private applications, RDP, SSH, VNC, and Telnet
    • Session recording, remediation, audit trails, monitoring, and alerts

    Where it doesn't

    • The free version may have different feature scope from paid offerings
    • Private resources require a Docker-based gateway for hosted access
    • It is proprietary rather than open source
  • Pomerium7.1/10 · Free plan

    A flexible open-source ZTNA proxy for teams that value self-hosting and policy control.

    Visit PomeriumFull verdict →
  • Portnox ZTNA6.9/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A posture-aware ZTNA service with passwordless access, session controls, and broad integrations.

    Visit PortnoxFull verdict →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update