Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · MLOps Platforms

Polyaxon vs MLRun

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 7 checks side by side
Higher score Polyaxon #2 in MLOps Platforms 8.5/10 Free plan · paid from $555/mo Free plan✓ 6 of 6 features Visit Polyaxon
MLRun #3 in MLOps Platforms 8.2/10 Open source · 14-day trial ✓ 6 of 6 features Visit MLRun

Polyaxon leads on 1 check, MLRun on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorePolyaxon · 8.5/10
  • Free planonly Polyaxon

Polyaxon scores higher on our rubric for mlops platforms: 8.5 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.

Polyaxon offers free plan; MLRun doesn't publish it.

Polyaxon is the better fit for kubernetes organizations needing enterprise controls. MLRun is the better fit for multi-cloud teams needing complete open-source MLOps.

  • Polyaxon fits best

    Kubernetes organizations needing enterprise controls

  • MLRun fits best

    Multi-cloud teams needing complete open-source MLOps

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Polyaxon 8.5/10 Visit ↗ MLRun 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 8.2
Ranking #2 in MLOps Platforms #3 in MLOps Platforms
Best for Kubernetes organizations needing enterprise controls Multi-cloud teams needing complete open-source MLOps
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price $555/mo Not published
Free plan ✓ (best) Not published
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Live chat, Community, Docs Email, Community, Docs
Integrations 20 integrations 15 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Polyaxon 6/6 · MLRun 6/6
Experiment tracking ✓ ✓
Model registry ✓ ✓
Pipeline orchestration ✓ ✓
Model serving ✓ ✓
Data versioning ✓ ✓
Managed compute ✓ ✓
Our review
Pros
  • Combines tracking, registries, pipelines, serving, and versioning
  • Supports Kubernetes scheduling, queues, priorities, and multi-cluster agents
  • Includes RBAC, audit trails, teams, roles, and SSO/SAML support
  • Covers tracking, registry, orchestration, serving, lineage, and monitoring
  • Supports Kubernetes, AWS EKS, Azure AKS, GKE, and self-hosting
  • Connects with GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Kubeflow, Spark, and Jupyter
Cons
  • Platform limits usage to 3 developer seats and 1 compute cluster
  • Teams costs $1,500 per month before custom Enterprise features
  • Its broad feature set may exceed the needs of narrowly focused teams
  • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of teams seeking one focused MLOps tool
  • Production workflows depend on Kubernetes or supported cloud environments
  • The managed service includes a 14-day trial rather than an ongoing free managed tier
Our verdict

Polyaxon is an AI engineering control plane for teams building, training, serving, and operating machine-learning workloads on Kubernetes. It brings experiment tracking, workflow orchestration, model and artifact registries, scheduling,…

Read the review →

MLRun is an open-source AI orchestration platform for data scientists, data engineers, and ML engineers. It brings data preparation, experiment tracking, model registration and versioning, workflow orchestration, model serving, monitoring,…

Read the review →
  1. PolyaxonMLOps Platforms 8.5Free plan · paid from $555/mo
  2. MLRunMLOps Platforms 8.2Open source · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Polyaxon — where it wins

    • Combines tracking, registries, pipelines, serving, and versioning
    • Supports Kubernetes scheduling, queues, priorities, and multi-cluster agents
    • Includes RBAC, audit trails, teams, roles, and SSO/SAML support

    Where it doesn't

    • Platform limits usage to 3 developer seats and 1 compute cluster
    • Teams costs $1,500 per month before custom Enterprise features
    • Its broad feature set may exceed the needs of narrowly focused teams
  • MLRun — where it wins

    • Covers tracking, registry, orchestration, serving, lineage, and monitoring
    • Supports Kubernetes, AWS EKS, Azure AKS, GKE, and self-hosting
    • Connects with GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Kubeflow, Spark, and Jupyter

    Where it doesn't

    • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of teams seeking one focused MLOps tool
    • Production workflows depend on Kubernetes or supported cloud environments
    • The managed service includes a 14-day trial rather than an ongoing free managed tier
  • Polyaxon8.5/10 · Free plan · paid from $555/mo

    A broad Kubernetes MLOps control plane for teams that need governance and scale.

    Visit PolyaxonFull verdict →
  • MLRun8.2/10 · Open source · 14-day trial

    A broad open-source MLOps platform spanning tracking, orchestration, serving, and monitoring.

    Visit MLRunFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on MLOps platforms

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update