Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Literature Review Software

PICO Portal vs INRA

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score PICO Portal #3 in Literature Review Software 9.2/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 1 of 5 features Visit PICO Portal
INRA #7 in Literature Review Software 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 5 features Visit INRA

PICO Portal leads on 0 checks, INRA on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorePICO Portal · 9.2/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly PICO Portal

PICO Portal scores higher on our rubric for literature review software: 9.2 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

PICO Portal is the better fit for AI-assisted systematic review teams. INRA is the better fit for AI-assisted reviews with source verification.

  • PICO Portal fits best

    AI-assisted systematic review teams

  • INRA fits best

    AI-assisted reviews with source verification

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature PICO Portal 9.2/10 Visit ↗ INRA 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.7
Ranking #3 in Literature Review Software #7 in Literature Review Software
Best for AI-assisted systematic review teams AI-assisted reviews with source verification
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — $7.50/seat/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Docs Email
Integrations 12 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Enterprise
Features PICO Portal 1/5 · INRA 1/5
Screening workflow ✓ ✓
Full-text management Not checked yet Not checked yet
Systematic review tools Not checked yet Not checked yet
Collaboration Not checked yet Not checked yet
Evidence mapping Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Discovery tools Not checked yet Not checked yet
Citation import limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Free plan includes screening, full-text review, and data extraction
  • Integrates with PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and more
  • Supports dual review, risk-of-bias assessment, and PRISMA reporting
  • Citation-backed reviews with inline source inspection
  • Full systematic review workflow, including screening and extraction
  • Zotero, Mendeley, PubMed, OpenAlex, and other source integrations
Cons
  • The free PICO Portal plan supports one project
  • Advanced ScholarIQ access is limited during the two-week trial
  • Paid-plan pricing requires contact with the vendor
  • Web-only access
  • Teams & Institutions requires at least three seats
  • AI assistance does not replace reviewer inclusion and judgment decisions
Our verdict

PICO Portal is a web-based evidence-synthesis platform for researchers conducting literature and systematic reviews. It is designed for academic, government, nonprofit, private-sector, policy, guideline, research-and-development, and…

Read the review →

INRA is a web-based AI-assisted research platform for researchers, graduate students, clinical teams, policy groups, and R&D teams. It supports academic search, source retrieval, uploaded PDFs, reference-manager sources, evidence…

Read the review →
  1. PICO PortalLiterature Review Software 9.2Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. INRALiterature Review Software 8.7Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • PICO Portal — where it wins

    • Free plan includes screening, full-text review, and data extraction
    • Integrates with PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and more
    • Supports dual review, risk-of-bias assessment, and PRISMA reporting

    Where it doesn't

    • The free PICO Portal plan supports one project
    • Advanced ScholarIQ access is limited during the two-week trial
    • Paid-plan pricing requires contact with the vendor
  • INRA — where it wins

    • Citation-backed reviews with inline source inspection
    • Full systematic review workflow, including screening and extraction
    • Zotero, Mendeley, PubMed, OpenAlex, and other source integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Web-only access
    • Teams & Institutions requires at least three seats
    • AI assistance does not replace reviewer inclusion and judgment decisions
  • PICO Portal9.2/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A broad web-based workspace for AI-assisted screening, extraction, and reporting.

    Visit PICO PortalFull verdict →
  • INRA8.7/10 · Free plan

    A broad review workflow with citation inspection, screening, extraction, and PRISMA outputs.

    Visit INRAFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update