Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Forestry Software

palos platform vs TigerWeb

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score palos platform #4 in Forestry Software 7.5/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit palos
TigerWeb #5 in Forestry Software 7.4/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit FORECON

palos platform leads on 0 checks, TigerWeb on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorepalos platform · 7.5/10

palos platform scores higher on our rubric for forestry software: 7.5 against 7.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

On mobile access, palos platform gives you Offline where TigerWeb offers Online.

palos platform is the better fit for forest businesses managing operations and timber sales. TigerWeb is the better fit for organizations managing timber sales and harvest planning.

  • palos platform fits best

    Forest businesses managing operations and timber sales

  • TigerWeb fits best

    Organizations managing timber sales and harvest planning

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature palos platform 7.5/10 Visit ↗ TigerWeb 7.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.5 7.4
Ranking #4 in Forestry Software #5 in Forestry Software
Best for Forest businesses managing operations and timber sales Organizations managing timber sales and harvest planning
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan — Not published
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features palos platform 3/3 · TigerWeb 3/3
Forest inventory ✓ ✓
Harvest planning ✓ ✓
Timber sales ✓ ✓
Specs
Mobile access Offline Online
Mapping capabilities Advanced Advanced
Our review
Pros
  • GIS mapping, inventory and plot-level cultivation and harvest planning
  • Offline mobile fieldwork with later synchronization
  • Timber ledgers, sales, invoicing and price calculation workflows
  • GIS layers combine satellite, topographic, and other base maps.
  • Interactive inventory spans plot, stand, and tract levels.
  • Growth projections support user-drawn areas and harvest analysis.
Cons
  • Package pricing is quote-based and requested per hectare or user
  • No free plan; free tests are available only by arrangement
  • The workflow spans many forestry processes and may exceed narrower needs
  • Contact-sales pricing does not provide self-serve plan selection.
  • No AI features are included.
  • Proprietary software is not open source.
Our verdict

Forest owners, foresters, forestry companies, service providers and associations can use palos platform to manage forestry work from mapping and inventory through harvesting and timber sales. Its cloud platform combines web access with iOS…

Read the review →

TigerWeb is a browser-based forestry system for managing and analyzing hardwood timberland data. It brings together GIS maps, field inventory and cruise data, growth and yield modeling, and reporting in a cloud deployment. FORECON…

Read the review →
  1. palos platformForestry Software 7.5Pricing on request
  2. TigerWebForestry Software 7.4Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • palos platform — where it wins

    • GIS mapping, inventory and plot-level cultivation and harvest planning
    • Offline mobile fieldwork with later synchronization
    • Timber ledgers, sales, invoicing and price calculation workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Package pricing is quote-based and requested per hectare or user
    • No free plan; free tests are available only by arrangement
    • The workflow spans many forestry processes and may exceed narrower needs

  • TigerWeb — where it wins

    • GIS layers combine satellite, topographic, and other base maps.
    • Interactive inventory spans plot, stand, and tract levels.
    • Growth projections support user-drawn areas and harvest analysis.

    Where it doesn't

    • Contact-sales pricing does not provide self-serve plan selection.
    • No AI features are included.
    • Proprietary software is not open source.
  • palos platform7.5/10 · Pricing on request

    A forestry-specific platform linking GIS planning, fieldwork and timber sales.

    Visit palosFull verdict →
  • TigerWeb7.4/10 · Pricing on request

    Web GIS for hardwood timber inventory, growth projections, and harvest planning.

    Visit FORECONFull verdict →

More comparisons

All forestry software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update