Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · On-Call Scheduling Software

PagerDuty vs Splunk On-Call

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score PagerDuty #1 in On-Call Scheduling Software 9.4/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 1 of 5 features Visit PagerDuty
Splunk On-Call #6 in On-Call Scheduling Software 8.6/10 14-day trial Free trial✓ 1 of 5 features Visit Splunk On-Call

PagerDuty leads on 1 check, Splunk On-Call on 1, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorePagerDuty · 9.4/10
  • Lowest starting priceSplunk On-Call · $5/user/mo
  • Free planonly PagerDuty
  • Free trialboth

PagerDuty scores higher on our rubric for on-call scheduling software: 9.4 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #6.

PagerDuty offers free plan; Splunk On-Call doesn't. Splunk On-Call is cheaper to start at $5/user/mo against $21/user/mo.

PagerDuty is the better fit for mature teams needing complete incident operations. Splunk On-Call is the better fit for teams wanting low-cost incident response analytics.

  • PagerDuty fits best

    Mature teams needing complete incident operations

  • Splunk On-Call fits best

    Teams wanting low-cost incident response analytics

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature PagerDuty 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Splunk On-Call 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 8.6
Ranking #1 in On-Call Scheduling Software #6 in On-Call Scheduling Software
Best for Mature teams needing complete incident operations Teams wanting low-cost incident response analytics
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $21/user/mo $5/user/mo (best)
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial 14 days 14 days
Free trial length 14 days · no card needed 14 days · no card needed
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web, iOS, Android
Support Email, Docs, Community Docs
Integrations 750+ integrations 100+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features PagerDuty 1/5 · Splunk On-Call 1/5
Rotation scheduling Not checked yet Not checked yet
Escalation policies ✓ ✓
Handoff tools Not checked yet Not checked yet
Calendar sync Not checked yet Not checked yet
Mobile app Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Notification channels Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • On-call schedules, escalation policies, and guided incident workflows
  • 750+ integrations plus Slack, Teams, Jira, and ServiceNow support
  • Status pages, post-incident reviews, mobile apps, APIs, and ChatOps
  • Rotations, overrides, and timed escalation steps support structured coverage.
  • Post-incident reviews include timelines and action items.
  • MTTA/MTTR analysis, war rooms, and audit trails support response learning.
Cons
  • Free plan is limited to 5 users, 1 schedule, and 1 escalation policy
  • Professional annual option is 16% cheaper than monthly billing per user
  • Enterprise uses custom pricing rather than a published rate
  • There is no perpetual free plan.
  • Status-page capability is basic and webhook-based.
  • The $5 starting price requires annual billing.
Our verdict

PagerDuty is a SaaS incident management platform for developers, DevOps, ITOps, reliability engineers, security teams, customer success teams, and business stakeholders. It brings together on-call scheduling, escalation policies, incident…

Read the review →

Splunk On-Call is incident management software for IT, DevOps, engineering, and operations teams. It ingests monitoring alerts, routes incidents through on-call schedules and escalation policies, and supports response across web, iOS,…

Read the review →
  1. PagerDutyOn-Call Scheduling Software 9.4Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. Splunk On-CallOn-Call Scheduling Software 8.614-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • PagerDuty — where it wins

    • On-call schedules, escalation policies, and guided incident workflows
    • 750+ integrations plus Slack, Teams, Jira, and ServiceNow support
    • Status pages, post-incident reviews, mobile apps, APIs, and ChatOps

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 5 users, 1 schedule, and 1 escalation policy
    • Professional annual option is 16% cheaper than monthly billing per user
    • Enterprise uses custom pricing rather than a published rate
  • Splunk On-Call — where it wins

    • Rotations, overrides, and timed escalation steps support structured coverage.
    • Post-incident reviews include timelines and action items.
    • MTTA/MTTR analysis, war rooms, and audit trails support response learning.

    Where it doesn't

    • There is no perpetual free plan.
    • Status-page capability is basic and webhook-based.
    • The $5 starting price requires annual billing.
  • PagerDuty9.4/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A broad incident operations suite for teams that need scheduling, response, and review workflows.

    Visit PagerDutyFull verdict →
  • Splunk On-Call8.6/10 · 14-day trial

    A low-cost option for incident analytics, with no free plan and basic status-page capability.

    Visit Splunk On-CallFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update