Head-to-head · Application Security Orchestration Platforms
OWASP DefectDojo vs Harness Security Testing Orchestration
OWASP DefectDojo leads on 1 check, Harness Security Testing Orchestration on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreOWASP DefectDojo · 9.0/10
- Free planonly OWASP DefectDojo
- Most featuresHarness Security Testing Orchestration · 4 of 4
OWASP DefectDojo scores higher on our rubric for application security orchestration platforms: 9.0 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.
OWASP DefectDojo offers free plan; Harness Security Testing Orchestration doesn't. On deployment model, OWASP DefectDojo gives you Hybrid where Harness Security Testing Orchestration offers Cloud.
OWASP DefectDojo is the better fit for organizations preferring open-source finding management. Harness Security Testing Orchestration is the better fit for CI/CD teams orchestrating many scanners.
- OWASP DefectDojo fits best
Organizations preferring open-source finding management
- Harness Security Testing Orchestration fits best
CI/CD teams orchestrating many scanners
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | OWASP DefectDojo 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | Harness Security Testing Orchestration 8.5/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Ranking | #3 in Application Security Orchestration Platforms | #6 in Application Security Orchestration Platforms |
| Best for | Organizations preferring open-source finding management | CI/CD teams orchestrating many scanners |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Paid |
| Starting price | — | — |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Community, Docs | Community, Docs |
| Compliance | SSO/SAML, 2FA | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA |
| Integrations | 500+ integrations | 40+ integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features OWASP DefectDojo 3/4 · Harness Security Testing Orchestration 4/4 | ||
| Finding deduplication | ✓ | ✓ |
| Remediation workflows | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy gates | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Ticketing sync | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Risk prioritization | Risk-based | Risk-based |
| Deployment model | Hybrid | Cloud |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | OWASP DefectDojo is an open-source DevSecOps platform for organizations that need to aggregate, organize, standardize, and track application security findings. It is suited to security and engineering teams managing results from multiple… Read the review → |
Harness Security Testing Orchestration (STO) centralizes application security findings across CI/CD pipelines. It is designed for AppSec, DevOps, and development teams managing security testing across many pipelines. The platform supports… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
OWASP DefectDojo — where it wins
- Imports and reimports findings from 500+ supported security tools
- Deduplication, triage, risk acceptance, SLAs, and remediation workflows
- REST API, Swagger UI, dashboards, reporting, and ticket synchronization
Where it doesn't
- Priority scoring and Rules Engine automation require Pro
- Role-based access control and tenant isolation are Pro features
- Pro uses quote-based pricing rather than a published price
Harness Security Testing Orchestration — where it wins
- Supports 40+ scanners with normalization and deduplication
- Risk correlation, prioritization, OPA gates, and exemptions
- Jira synchronization, audit logs, and reusable pipeline templates
Where it doesn't
- STO is available through paid bundles or modular Enterprise plans
- The Free Plan does not include STO
- Jira auto-ticket creation may require a feature flag
- OWASP DefectDojo9.0/10 · Free plan
A flexible open-source hub for importing, triaging, prioritizing, and tracking security findings.
Visit DefectDojoFull verdict → - Harness Security Testing Orchestration8.5/10 · Pricing on request
A broad scanner-orchestration layer for CI/CD teams that need normalized, prioritized findings.
Visit HarnessFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Conviso Platform vs OWASP DefectDojo
- Conviso Platform vs Harness Security Testing Orchestration
- ScanDog vs OWASP DefectDojo
- ScanDog vs Harness Security Testing Orchestration
- OWASP DefectDojo vs OX Security
- OWASP DefectDojo vs Cycode ASPM
- OWASP DefectDojo vs Strobes ASPM
- OWASP DefectDojo vs Vulnetix Resolve
All application security orchestration platforms comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update







