Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Application Security Orchestration Platforms

OWASP DefectDojo vs Harness Security Testing Orchestration

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side

OWASP DefectDojo leads on 1 check, Harness Security Testing Orchestration on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOWASP DefectDojo · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly OWASP DefectDojo
  • Most featuresHarness Security Testing Orchestration · 4 of 4

OWASP DefectDojo scores higher on our rubric for application security orchestration platforms: 9.0 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.

OWASP DefectDojo offers free plan; Harness Security Testing Orchestration doesn't. On deployment model, OWASP DefectDojo gives you Hybrid where Harness Security Testing Orchestration offers Cloud.

OWASP DefectDojo is the better fit for organizations preferring open-source finding management. Harness Security Testing Orchestration is the better fit for CI/CD teams orchestrating many scanners.

  • OWASP DefectDojo fits best

    Organizations preferring open-source finding management

  • Harness Security Testing Orchestration fits best

    CI/CD teams orchestrating many scanners

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OWASP DefectDojo 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Harness Security Testing Orchestration 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.5
Ranking #3 in Application Security Orchestration Platforms #6 in Application Security Orchestration Platforms
Best for Organizations preferring open-source finding management CI/CD teams orchestrating many scanners
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price — —
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Community, Docs Community, Docs
Compliance SSO/SAML, 2FA SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA
Integrations 500+ integrations 40+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OWASP DefectDojo 3/4 · Harness Security Testing Orchestration 4/4
Finding deduplication ✓ ✓
Remediation workflows ✓ ✓
Policy gates Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Ticketing sync ✓ ✓
Specs
Risk prioritization Risk-based Risk-based
Deployment model Hybrid Cloud
Our review
Pros
  • Imports and reimports findings from 500+ supported security tools
  • Deduplication, triage, risk acceptance, SLAs, and remediation workflows
  • REST API, Swagger UI, dashboards, reporting, and ticket synchronization
  • Supports 40+ scanners with normalization and deduplication
  • Risk correlation, prioritization, OPA gates, and exemptions
  • Jira synchronization, audit logs, and reusable pipeline templates
Cons
  • Priority scoring and Rules Engine automation require Pro
  • Role-based access control and tenant isolation are Pro features
  • Pro uses quote-based pricing rather than a published price
  • STO is available through paid bundles or modular Enterprise plans
  • The Free Plan does not include STO
  • Jira auto-ticket creation may require a feature flag
Our verdict

OWASP DefectDojo is an open-source DevSecOps platform for organizations that need to aggregate, organize, standardize, and track application security findings. It is suited to security and engineering teams managing results from multiple…

Read the review →

Harness Security Testing Orchestration (STO) centralizes application security findings across CI/CD pipelines. It is designed for AppSec, DevOps, and development teams managing security testing across many pipelines. The platform supports…

Read the review →
  1. OWASP DefectDojoApplication Security Orchestration Platforms 9.0Free plan
  2. Harness Security Testing OrchestrationApplication Security Orchestration Platforms 8.5Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OWASP DefectDojo — where it wins

    • Imports and reimports findings from 500+ supported security tools
    • Deduplication, triage, risk acceptance, SLAs, and remediation workflows
    • REST API, Swagger UI, dashboards, reporting, and ticket synchronization

    Where it doesn't

    • Priority scoring and Rules Engine automation require Pro
    • Role-based access control and tenant isolation are Pro features
    • Pro uses quote-based pricing rather than a published price
  • Harness Security Testing Orchestration — where it wins

    • Supports 40+ scanners with normalization and deduplication
    • Risk correlation, prioritization, OPA gates, and exemptions
    • Jira synchronization, audit logs, and reusable pipeline templates

    Where it doesn't

    • STO is available through paid bundles or modular Enterprise plans
    • The Free Plan does not include STO
    • Jira auto-ticket creation may require a feature flag
  • OWASP DefectDojo9.0/10 · Free plan

    A flexible open-source hub for importing, triaging, prioritizing, and tracking security findings.

    Visit DefectDojoFull verdict →
  • Harness Security Testing Orchestration8.5/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad scanner-orchestration layer for CI/CD teams that need normalized, prioritized findings.

    Visit HarnessFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update