Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Application Security Orchestration Platforms

OWASP DefectDojo vs Cycode ASPM

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score OWASP DefectDojo #3 in Application Security Orchestration Platforms 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit DefectDojo
Cycode ASPM #5 in Application Security Orchestration Platforms 8.6/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 4 features Visit Cycode

OWASP DefectDojo leads on 1 check, Cycode ASPM on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOWASP DefectDojo · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly OWASP DefectDojo
  • Most featuresOWASP DefectDojo · 3 of 4

OWASP DefectDojo scores higher on our rubric for application security orchestration platforms: 9.0 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.

OWASP DefectDojo offers free plan; Cycode ASPM doesn't.

OWASP DefectDojo is the better fit for organizations preferring open-source finding management. Cycode ASPM is the better fit for large teams consolidating many security tools.

  • OWASP DefectDojo fits best

    Organizations preferring open-source finding management

  • Cycode ASPM fits best

    Large teams consolidating many security tools

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OWASP DefectDojo 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Cycode ASPM 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.6
Ranking #3 in Application Security Orchestration Platforms #5 in Application Security Orchestration Platforms
Best for Organizations preferring open-source finding management Large teams consolidating many security tools
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price — Pricing on request
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Compliance SSO/SAML, 2FA SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR
Integrations 500+ integrations 120+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Enterprise
Features OWASP DefectDojo 3/4 · Cycode ASPM 1/4
Finding deduplication ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Remediation workflows ✓ ✓
Policy gates Not checked yet Not checked yet
Ticketing sync ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Risk prioritization Risk-based Not checked yet
Deployment model Hybrid Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Imports and reimports findings from 500+ supported security tools
  • Deduplication, triage, risk acceptance, SLAs, and remediation workflows
  • REST API, Swagger UI, dashboards, reporting, and ticket synchronization
  • Correlates and deduplicates findings across multiple security tools and scanners
  • Maps risks to owners and prioritizes them by business context and exploitability
  • Connects with 120+ tools and supports SBOM management and compliance reporting
Cons
  • Priority scoring and Rules Engine automation require Pro
  • Role-based access control and tenant isolation are Pro features
  • Pro uses quote-based pricing rather than a published price
  • Pricing uses contact-sales plans, which can make budget planning less direct
  • There is no free plan for teams seeking a no-cost starting point
  • Its broad code-to-cloud scope may exceed the needs of narrowly focused teams
Our verdict

OWASP DefectDojo is an open-source DevSecOps platform for organizations that need to aggregate, organize, standardize, and track application security findings. It is suited to security and engineering teams managing results from multiple…

Read the review →

Cycode ASPM is an application security posture management platform for security and development teams managing risk across the software lifecycle. It consolidates findings from application code, dependencies, infrastructure, containers,…

Read the review →
  1. OWASP DefectDojoApplication Security Orchestration Platforms 9.0Free plan
  2. Cycode ASPMApplication Security Orchestration Platforms 8.6Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OWASP DefectDojo — where it wins

    • Imports and reimports findings from 500+ supported security tools
    • Deduplication, triage, risk acceptance, SLAs, and remediation workflows
    • REST API, Swagger UI, dashboards, reporting, and ticket synchronization

    Where it doesn't

    • Priority scoring and Rules Engine automation require Pro
    • Role-based access control and tenant isolation are Pro features
    • Pro uses quote-based pricing rather than a published price
  • Cycode ASPM — where it wins

    • Correlates and deduplicates findings across multiple security tools and scanners
    • Maps risks to owners and prioritizes them by business context and exploitability
    • Connects with 120+ tools and supports SBOM management and compliance reporting

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing uses contact-sales plans, which can make budget planning less direct
    • There is no free plan for teams seeking a no-cost starting point
    • Its broad code-to-cloud scope may exceed the needs of narrowly focused teams
  • OWASP DefectDojo9.0/10 · Free plan

    A flexible open-source hub for importing, triaging, prioritizing, and tracking security findings.

    Visit DefectDojoFull verdict →
  • Cycode ASPM8.6/10 · Pricing on request

    Cycode ASPM consolidates security findings, ownership, risk context, remediation and SBOMs.

    Visit CycodeFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update