Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Object Storage Services

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage vs Ceph

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage #4 in Object Storage Services 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Oracle OCI
Ceph #11 in Object Storage Services 8.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Ceph

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage leads on 0 checks, Ceph on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage scores higher on our rubric for object storage services: 9.0 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #11.

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage is the better fit for OCI users needing capable general storage. Ceph is the better fit for open-source self-hosted object storage.

  • Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage fits best

    OCI users needing capable general storage

  • Ceph fits best

    Open-source self-hosted object storage

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Ceph 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.3
Ranking #4 in Object Storage Services #11 in Object Storage Services
Best for OCI users needing capable general storage Open-source self-hosted object storage
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Self-hosted
Integrations 6 integrations 6 integrations
Features Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage 4/4 · Ceph 4/4
S3 compatibility ✓ ✓
Object versioning ✓ ✓
Lifecycle rules ✓ ✓
Object immutability ✓ ✓
Specs
Max object size 10240 GB Not checked yet
Replication scope Cross-region Cross-region
Our review
Pros
  • S3 compatibility supports familiar tools, SDKs, and workflows.
  • Versioning, lifecycle policies, retention, and legal holds support governance.
  • Replication, encryption, bulk operations, and multiple tiers cover varied workloads.
  • S3 and OpenStack Swift-compatible object storage APIs
  • Versioning, lifecycle controls, and Object Lock retention modes
  • Object, block, and file interfaces from one cluster
Cons
  • Choosing among Standard, Infrequent Access, and Archive adds planning overhead.
  • Regional storage may require replication planning for broader geographic coverage.
  • Its broad feature set may be more than needed for simple storage tasks.
  • Self-hosted deployment requires ongoing operational responsibility
  • Storage clusters require configurable infrastructure and administration
  • Focused on infrastructure teams rather than hosted-storage simplicity
Our verdict

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage is a regional service for storing and retrieving unstructured data, including media, backups, archives, and analytics data. Its bucket-based model supports storage through the web console, CLI,…

Read the review →

Ceph is an open-source distributed storage system for organizations that need object, block, and file storage from one cluster. It is deployed as self-hosted infrastructure and uses configurable storage clusters with commodity hardware.…

Read the review →
  1. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object StorageObject Storage Services 9.0Free plan
  2. CephObject Storage Services 8.3Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage — where it wins

    • S3 compatibility supports familiar tools, SDKs, and workflows.
    • Versioning, lifecycle policies, retention, and legal holds support governance.
    • Replication, encryption, bulk operations, and multiple tiers cover varied workloads.

    Where it doesn't

    • Choosing among Standard, Infrequent Access, and Archive adds planning overhead.
    • Regional storage may require replication planning for broader geographic coverage.
    • Its broad feature set may be more than needed for simple storage tasks.

  • Ceph — where it wins

    • S3 and OpenStack Swift-compatible object storage APIs
    • Versioning, lifecycle controls, and Object Lock retention modes
    • Object, block, and file interfaces from one cluster

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires ongoing operational responsibility
    • Storage clusters require configurable infrastructure and administration
    • Focused on infrastructure teams rather than hosted-storage simplicity
  • Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage9.0/10 · Free plan

    A capable general-purpose object store, especially for OCI users and S3-compatible workflows.

    Visit Oracle OCIFull verdict →
  • Ceph8.3/10 · Free plan

    A flexible self-hosted storage cluster for teams that can manage infrastructure.

    Visit CephFull verdict →

More comparisons

All object storage services comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update