Head-to-head · Configuration Management Tools
OpenText Server Automation vs Microsoft Desired State Configuration
OpenText Server Automation leads on 0 checks, Microsoft Desired State Configuration on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreOpenText Server Automation · 8.8/10
OpenText Server Automation scores higher on our rubric for configuration management tools: 8.8 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #10.
OpenText Server Automation is the better fit for large operations needing provisioning and remediation. Microsoft Desired State Configuration is the better fit for developers needing portable declarative configuration.
- OpenText Server Automation fits best
Large operations needing provisioning and remediation
- Microsoft Desired State Configuration fits best
Developers needing portable declarative configuration
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | OpenText Server Automation 8.8/10 Visit ↗ | Microsoft Desired State Configuration 8.2/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Ranking | #4 in Configuration Management Tools | #10 in Configuration Management Tools |
| Best for | Large operations needing provisioning and remediation | Developers needing portable declarative configuration |
| Pricing model | Paid | Free |
| Starting price | Pricing on request | Open source |
| Free plan | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Support | Email, Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs | Docs |
| Integrations | 4 integrations | 4 integrations |
| Built for | Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features OpenText Server Automation 4/4 · Microsoft Desired State Configuration 4/4 | ||
| Drift detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Patch management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Policy as code | ✓ | ✓ |
| Compliance reporting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment model | Self_hosted | Self_hosted |
| Agent model | Both | Not checked yet |
| Supported platforms | Windows Server, Windows, Linux, UNIX, AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Ubuntu, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, Debian, Oracle Linux, VMware ESXi | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | OpenText Server Automation is built for enterprise teams managing server lifecycles across heterogeneous environments. It covers operating-system provisioning for bare-metal and virtual servers, centralized configuration management,… Read the review → |
Microsoft Desired State Configuration (DSC) is an open-source, self-hosted configuration management platform for developers and administrators who need portable declarative configuration. Its current DSC 3.x implementation is a standalone… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
OpenText Server Automation — where it wins
- Provisioning, configuration, patching, compliance, and remediation in one product
- Manages Windows, Linux, and UNIX across physical and cloud environments
- Discovers unmanaged agentless servers and supports agent deployment
Where it doesn't
- Pricing uses a contact-sales model rather than published plan details
- The listed integration ecosystem centers on OpenText, Ansible, and Chef
- The product is available through a web platform rather than native desktop apps
Microsoft Desired State Configuration — where it wins
- Runs agentless across Linux, macOS, and Windows
- Supports JSON and YAML configuration documents
- Compares configuration drift against desired state
Where it doesn't
- Does not cover patch management
- Does not provide compliance reporting
- Self-hosted deployment requires operational ownership
- OpenText Server Automation8.8/10 · Pricing on request
A broad platform for provisioning, patching, compliance, and remediation across heterogeneous servers.
Visit OpenTextFull verdict → - Microsoft Desired State Configuration8.2/10 · Open source
A portable, open-source DSC CLI for defining and comparing machine state.
Visit Microsoft DSCFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Puppet vs OpenText Server Automation
- AWS Systems Manager State Manager vs OpenText Server Automation
- Google Cloud VM Manager vs OpenText Server Automation
- OpenText Server Automation vs Rudder
- OpenText Server Automation vs Salt
- OpenText Server Automation vs Uyuni
- OpenText Server Automation vs CFEngine
All configuration management tools comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update







