Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Configuration Management Tools

OpenText Server Automation vs Microsoft Desired State Configuration

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side

OpenText Server Automation leads on 0 checks, Microsoft Desired State Configuration on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Server Automation · 8.8/10

OpenText Server Automation scores higher on our rubric for configuration management tools: 8.8 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #10.

OpenText Server Automation is the better fit for large operations needing provisioning and remediation. Microsoft Desired State Configuration is the better fit for developers needing portable declarative configuration.

  • OpenText Server Automation fits best

    Large operations needing provisioning and remediation

  • Microsoft Desired State Configuration fits best

    Developers needing portable declarative configuration

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Server Automation 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Microsoft Desired State Configuration 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.2
Ranking #4 in Configuration Management Tools #10 in Configuration Management Tools
Best for Large operations needing provisioning and remediation Developers needing portable declarative configuration
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price Pricing on request Open source
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Support Email, Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs Docs
Integrations 4 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Server Automation 4/4 · Microsoft Desired State Configuration 4/4
Drift detection ✓ ✓
Patch management ✓ ✓
Policy as code ✓ ✓
Compliance reporting ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Self_hosted Self_hosted
Agent model Both Not checked yet
Supported platforms Windows Server, Windows, Linux, UNIX, AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Ubuntu, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, Debian, Oracle Linux, VMware ESXi Linux, macOS, Windows
Our review
Pros
  • Provisioning, configuration, patching, compliance, and remediation in one product
  • Manages Windows, Linux, and UNIX across physical and cloud environments
  • Discovers unmanaged agentless servers and supports agent deployment
  • Runs agentless across Linux, macOS, and Windows
  • Supports JSON and YAML configuration documents
  • Compares configuration drift against desired state
Cons
  • Pricing uses a contact-sales model rather than published plan details
  • The listed integration ecosystem centers on OpenText, Ansible, and Chef
  • The product is available through a web platform rather than native desktop apps
  • Does not cover patch management
  • Does not provide compliance reporting
  • Self-hosted deployment requires operational ownership
Our verdict

OpenText Server Automation is built for enterprise teams managing server lifecycles across heterogeneous environments. It covers operating-system provisioning for bare-metal and virtual servers, centralized configuration management,…

Read the review →

Microsoft Desired State Configuration (DSC) is an open-source, self-hosted configuration management platform for developers and administrators who need portable declarative configuration. Its current DSC 3.x implementation is a standalone…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Server AutomationConfiguration Management Tools 8.8Pricing on request
  2. Microsoft Desired State ConfigurationConfiguration Management Tools 8.2Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Server Automation — where it wins

    • Provisioning, configuration, patching, compliance, and remediation in one product
    • Manages Windows, Linux, and UNIX across physical and cloud environments
    • Discovers unmanaged agentless servers and supports agent deployment

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing uses a contact-sales model rather than published plan details
    • The listed integration ecosystem centers on OpenText, Ansible, and Chef
    • The product is available through a web platform rather than native desktop apps
  • Microsoft Desired State Configuration — where it wins

    • Runs agentless across Linux, macOS, and Windows
    • Supports JSON and YAML configuration documents
    • Compares configuration drift against desired state

    Where it doesn't

    • Does not cover patch management
    • Does not provide compliance reporting
    • Self-hosted deployment requires operational ownership
  • OpenText Server Automation8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad platform for provisioning, patching, compliance, and remediation across heterogeneous servers.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • Microsoft Desired State Configuration8.2/10 · Open source

    A portable, open-source DSC CLI for defining and comparing machine state.

    Visit Microsoft DSCFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update