Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Test Automation Software

OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs mabl

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) #2 in Test Automation Software 9.2/10 Pricing on request Free trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit OpenText
mabl #8 in Test Automation Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request · 14-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit mabl

OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) leads on 0 checks, mabl on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) · 9.2/10
  • Free trialboth

OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) scores higher on our rubric for test automation software: 9.2 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #8.

OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) is the better fit for mature enterprise application testing teams. mabl is the better fit for AI-assisted end-to-end web testing teams.

  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) fits best

    Mature enterprise application testing teams

  • mabl fits best

    AI-assisted end-to-end web testing teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) 9.2/10 Visit ↗ mabl 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.6
Ranking #2 in Test Automation Software #8 in Test Automation Software
Best for Mature enterprise application testing teams AI-assisted end-to-end web testing teams
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request · 14-day trial
Free plan — —
Free trial 30 days 14 days
Free trial length 30 days 14 days
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Windows, Linux Web
Support Phone, Community, Docs, Tickets Email, Live chat, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 14 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) 0/4 · mabl 0/4
Cross-browser testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Mobile testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Test scheduling Not checked yet Not checked yet
CI/CD integration Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Test targets Not checked yet Not checked yet
Parallel runs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Execution environment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, packaged, and SAP applications
  • Reusable components, AI object recognition, and distributed execution
  • Integrates with Git, Jenkins, Docker, and OpenText lifecycle products
  • Low-code, natural-language, and agentic test authoring
  • Broad browser, mobile, API, visual, and accessibility coverage
  • Self-hosted CI runners plus extensive workflow integrations
Cons
  • Pricing and licensing require contacting OpenText
  • Deployment is listed for Windows and self-hosted environments
  • Mobile tests run up to four in parallel per license
  • Pricing is handled through contact sales
  • There is no free plan
  • Mobile web testing uses Chrome device emulation
Our verdict

OpenText Functional Testing, formerly UFT One, is an enterprise functional and end-to-end test automation tool for QA teams and test engineers. Its coverage spans web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, packaged, and SAP…

Read the review →

mabl is an AI-native test automation platform for software development and quality teams. It supports end-to-end testing for browser-based web applications, mobile applications, APIs, accessibility, performance, visual behavior, email, and…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)Test Automation Software 9.2Pricing on request
  2. mablTest Automation Software 8.6Pricing on request · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) — where it wins

    • Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, packaged, and SAP applications
    • Reusable components, AI object recognition, and distributed execution
    • Integrates with Git, Jenkins, Docker, and OpenText lifecycle products

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing and licensing require contacting OpenText
    • Deployment is listed for Windows and self-hosted environments
    • Mobile tests run up to four in parallel per license
  • mabl — where it wins

    • Low-code, natural-language, and agentic test authoring
    • Broad browser, mobile, API, visual, and accessibility coverage
    • Self-hosted CI runners plus extensive workflow integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through contact sales
    • There is no free plan
    • Mobile web testing uses Chrome device emulation
  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)9.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad, self-hosted automation suite for mature enterprise testing teams.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • mabl8.6/10 · Pricing on request · 14-day trial

    A broad AI-assisted testing platform for teams that need low-code authoring and CI execution.

    Visit mablFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update