Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Test Automation Software

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Tricentis Tosca #1 in Test Automation Software 9.3/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 4 features Try Tricentis Tosca
OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) #2 in Test Automation Software 9.2/10 Pricing on request Free trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit OpenText

Tricentis Tosca leads on 0 checks, OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreTricentis Tosca · 9.3/10
  • Free trialonly OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)

Tricentis Tosca scores higher on our rubric for test automation software: 9.3 against 9.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.

Tricentis Tosca is the better fit for enterprise model-based end-to-end testing. OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) is the better fit for mature enterprise application testing teams.

  • Tricentis Tosca fits best

    Enterprise model-based end-to-end testing

  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) fits best

    Mature enterprise application testing teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Tricentis Tosca 9.3/10 Visit ↗ OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) 9.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 9.2
Ranking #1 in Test Automation Software #2 in Test Automation Software
Best for Enterprise model-based end-to-end testing Mature enterprise application testing teams
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — 30 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Web Windows, Linux
Support Community, Docs Phone, Community, Docs, Tickets
Integrations 4 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Enterprise, Mid-market Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Tricentis Tosca 0/4 · OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) 0/4
Cross-browser testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Mobile testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Test scheduling Not checked yet Not checked yet
CI/CD integration Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Test targets Not checked yet Not checked yet
Parallel runs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Execution environment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Codeless model-based authoring with AI test generation
  • UI, API, data, mobile, accessibility, and risk-based coverage
  • Parallel execution with CI/CD integrations and self-hosted deployment
  • Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, packaged, and SAP applications
  • Reusable components, AI object recognition, and distributed execution
  • Integrates with Git, Jenkins, Docker, and OpenText lifecycle products
Cons
  • Pricing requires contact with sales
  • No free plan
  • Broad enterprise scope may exceed simpler testing needs
  • Pricing and licensing require contacting OpenText
  • Deployment is listed for Windows and self-hosted environments
  • Mobile tests run up to four in parallel per license
Our verdict

Tricentis Tosca is a continuous testing platform for enterprise QA, development, and business teams. Its codeless, model-based approach supports end-to-end automation across web, APIs, mobile applications, desktop software, packaged…

Read the review →

OpenText Functional Testing, formerly UFT One, is an enterprise functional and end-to-end test automation tool for QA teams and test engineers. Its coverage spans web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, packaged, and SAP…

Read the review →
  1. Tricentis ToscaTest Automation Software 9.3Pricing on request
  2. OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)Test Automation Software 9.2Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Tricentis Tosca — where it wins

    • Codeless model-based authoring with AI test generation
    • UI, API, data, mobile, accessibility, and risk-based coverage
    • Parallel execution with CI/CD integrations and self-hosted deployment

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contact with sales
    • No free plan
    • Broad enterprise scope may exceed simpler testing needs
  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) — where it wins

    • Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, packaged, and SAP applications
    • Reusable components, AI object recognition, and distributed execution
    • Integrates with Git, Jenkins, Docker, and OpenText lifecycle products

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing and licensing require contacting OpenText
    • Deployment is listed for Windows and self-hosted environments
    • Mobile tests run up to four in parallel per license
  • Tricentis Tosca9.3/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad, codeless automation platform for complex enterprise testing programs.

    Try Tricentis ToscaFull verdict →
  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)9.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad, self-hosted automation suite for mature enterprise testing teams.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update