OpenReview vs ConfTool

OpenReview7.4Visit ConfTool6.4Visit

Higher score OpenReview #7 in Call for Papers Software 7.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit OpenReview

vs

ConfTool #10 in Call for Papers Software 6.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit ConfTool

• OpenReview fits best

  Open, API-driven peer review

• ConfTool fits best

  Hybrid conferences with broad platform coverage

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	OpenReview 7.4/10 Visit ↗	ConfTool 6.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	7.4	6.4
Ranking	#7 in Call for Papers Software	#10 in Call for Papers Software
Best for	Open, API-driven peer review	Hybrid conferences with broad platform coverage
Pricing model	Free	Free plan + paid
Starting price	Not published	Not published
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud, Self-hosted, Mobile
Platforms	Web	Web, iOS, Android
Support	Email, Docs	Email, Phone, Docs
Integrations	1 integrations	7 integrations
Built for	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenReview 1/2 · ConfTool 0/2
Blind review	✓ (best)	Not published
Schedule builder	Not published	Not published
Specs
Submission types	Mixed	Not published
Review stages	Multi_stage	Not published
Submission limit	Not published	Not published
Reviewer limit	Not published	Not published
Our review
Pros	Supports conferences, workshops, journals, and symposiums Configurable forms, review stages, visibility, and conflict management REST API supports workflow automation, assignments, and permissions	Online submission and peer-review workflows Tracks, rooms, speakers and agendas in one system Hybrid resources and attendee mobile-app integrations
Cons	Its focus is scholarly review rather than general event operations REST API is the only listed integration Web and API access are the listed platform options	ConfTool Standard supports up to 150 participants Standard is intended for smaller non-commercial events Pro pricing depends on event requirements and size
Our verdict	OpenReview is a cloud-based platform for conferences, workshops, journals, symposiums, and other reviewing entities. It covers paper and abstract submission, reviewer invitations, paper groups, deadlines, customizable forms, review… Read the review →	ConfTool is a web-based event management system for academic conferences, workshops, congresses and seminars. It combines online submission and peer review with program scheduling, room assignments, participant registration, invoicing and… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• OpenReview — where it wins

  • Supports conferences, workshops, journals, and symposiums
  • Configurable forms, review stages, visibility, and conflict management
  • REST API supports workflow automation, assignments, and permissions

  Where it doesn't

  • Its focus is scholarly review rather than general event operations
  • REST API is the only listed integration
  • Web and API access are the listed platform options

• ConfTool — where it wins

  • Online submission and peer-review workflows
  • Tracks, rooms, speakers and agendas in one system
  • Hybrid resources and attendee mobile-app integrations

  Where it doesn't

  • ConfTool Standard supports up to 150 participants
  • Standard is intended for smaller non-commercial events
  • Pro pricing depends on event requirements and size

• OpenReview7.4/10 · Free plan

  A free, open-source choice for configurable scholarly peer review and publishing workflows.

  Visit OpenReviewFull verdict →
• ConfTool6.4/10 · Free plan

  A broad conference platform covering review, scheduling, registration and hybrid events.

  Visit ConfToolFull verdict →