Head-to-head · Terminal File Managers
Newt vs Rat Commander
Newt leads on 0 checks, Rat Commander on 0, and 8 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 8 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreNewt · 9.4/10
- Free planboth
Newt scores higher on our rubric for terminal file managers: 9.4 against 9.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.
Newt is the better fit for cross-platform remote and local file management. Rat Commander is the better fit for power users needing deep file operations.
- Newt fits best
Cross-platform remote and local file management
- Rat Commander fits best
Power users needing deep file operations
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Newt 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | Rat Commander 9.2/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Ranking | #1 in Terminal File Managers | #2 in Terminal File Managers |
| Best for | Cross-platform remote and local file management | Power users needing deep file operations |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Platforms | macOS, Linux, Windows | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Docs | Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Newt 7/7 · Rat Commander 7/7 | ||
| Dual-pane layout | ✓ | ✓ |
| Linux support | ✓ | ✓ |
| macOS support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Windows support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Preview pane | ✓ | ✓ |
| Remote file access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Archive support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Newt is a keyboard-first, two-pane file manager for macOS, Linux, and Windows. It is aimed at people who want one interface for local filesystem work and remote locations, including SSH sessions, S3 and SFTP filesystems, containers,… Read the review → |
Rat Commander is a terminal-based file manager for Linux, macOS, and Windows. It is designed for users who prefer keyboard-driven navigation and want file operations, viewing, editing, archives, remote filesystems, Git, and disk utilities… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Newt — where it wins
- Dual panes support side-by-side file operations
- Works with SSH, S3, SFTP, containers, Kubernetes, and WSL
- Browses archives and supports recursive filename and content search
Where it doesn't
- Currently distributed as nightly development snapshots
- Keyboard-first workflows may not suit mouse-led file management
- Its broad remote support can mean more configuration across environments
Rat Commander — where it wins
- Dual-pane workflows with vertical or horizontal splits
- Remote filesystems, archives, Git, synchronization, and comparisons
- Free, open-source packages for Linux, macOS, and Windows
Where it doesn't
- Terminal-based workflows may not suit users who prefer graphical file managers
- Linux disk management features are not listed for macOS or Windows
- Its broad toolset may exceed the needs of users seeking basic file browsing
- Newt9.4/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source file manager for local work, remote sessions, archives, and search.
Visit NewtFull verdict → - Rat Commander9.2/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source file manager for keyboard-driven work across three desktop platforms.
Visit Rat CommanderFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Newt vs FileManagerTUI
- Newt vs Yazi
- Newt vs Vifm
- Newt vs far2l
- Newt vs RTFM
- Newt vs Zeta
- Rat Commander vs FileManagerTUI
- Rat Commander vs Yazi
All terminal file managers comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update




