Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Terminal File Managers

Newt vs Rat Commander

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 8 checks side by side
Higher score Newt #1 in Terminal File Managers 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 7 of 7 features Visit Newt
Rat Commander #2 in Terminal File Managers 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 7 of 7 features Visit Rat Commander

Newt leads on 0 checks, Rat Commander on 0, and 8 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 8 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreNewt · 9.4/10
  • Free planboth

Newt scores higher on our rubric for terminal file managers: 9.4 against 9.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.

Newt is the better fit for cross-platform remote and local file management. Rat Commander is the better fit for power users needing deep file operations.

  • Newt fits best

    Cross-platform remote and local file management

  • Rat Commander fits best

    Power users needing deep file operations

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Newt 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Rat Commander 9.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 9.2
Ranking #1 in Terminal File Managers #2 in Terminal File Managers
Best for Cross-platform remote and local file management Power users needing deep file operations
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Desktop
Platforms macOS, Linux, Windows Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Newt 7/7 · Rat Commander 7/7
Dual-pane layout ✓ ✓
Linux support ✓ ✓
macOS support ✓ ✓
Windows support ✓ ✓
Preview pane ✓ ✓
Remote file access ✓ ✓
Archive support ✓ ✓
Our review
Pros
  • Dual panes support side-by-side file operations
  • Works with SSH, S3, SFTP, containers, Kubernetes, and WSL
  • Browses archives and supports recursive filename and content search
  • Dual-pane workflows with vertical or horizontal splits
  • Remote filesystems, archives, Git, synchronization, and comparisons
  • Free, open-source packages for Linux, macOS, and Windows
Cons
  • Currently distributed as nightly development snapshots
  • Keyboard-first workflows may not suit mouse-led file management
  • Its broad remote support can mean more configuration across environments
  • Terminal-based workflows may not suit users who prefer graphical file managers
  • Linux disk management features are not listed for macOS or Windows
  • Its broad toolset may exceed the needs of users seeking basic file browsing
Our verdict

Newt is a keyboard-first, two-pane file manager for macOS, Linux, and Windows. It is aimed at people who want one interface for local filesystem work and remote locations, including SSH sessions, S3 and SFTP filesystems, containers,…

Read the review →

Rat Commander is a terminal-based file manager for Linux, macOS, and Windows. It is designed for users who prefer keyboard-driven navigation and want file operations, viewing, editing, archives, remote filesystems, Git, and disk utilities…

Read the review →
  1. NewtTerminal File Managers 9.4Free plan
  2. Rat CommanderTerminal File Managers 9.2Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Newt — where it wins

    • Dual panes support side-by-side file operations
    • Works with SSH, S3, SFTP, containers, Kubernetes, and WSL
    • Browses archives and supports recursive filename and content search

    Where it doesn't

    • Currently distributed as nightly development snapshots
    • Keyboard-first workflows may not suit mouse-led file management
    • Its broad remote support can mean more configuration across environments
  • Rat Commander — where it wins

    • Dual-pane workflows with vertical or horizontal splits
    • Remote filesystems, archives, Git, synchronization, and comparisons
    • Free, open-source packages for Linux, macOS, and Windows

    Where it doesn't

    • Terminal-based workflows may not suit users who prefer graphical file managers
    • Linux disk management features are not listed for macOS or Windows
    • Its broad toolset may exceed the needs of users seeking basic file browsing

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update