Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Graph Databases

Neo4j vs TigerGraph

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Neo4j #1 in Graph Databases 9.4/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Neo4j
TigerGraph #5 in Graph Databases 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 3 features Visit TigerGraph

Neo4j leads on 0 checks, TigerGraph on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreNeo4j · 9.4/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Neo4j

Neo4j scores higher on our rubric for graph databases: 9.4 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #5.

Neo4j is the better fit for broad enterprise graph workloads. TigerGraph is the better fit for large-scale parallel graph analytics.

  • Neo4j fits best

    Broad enterprise graph workloads

  • TigerGraph fits best

    Large-scale parallel graph analytics

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Neo4j 9.4/10 Visit ↗ TigerGraph 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 8.7
Ranking #1 in Graph Databases #5 in Graph Databases
Best for Broad enterprise graph workloads Large-scale parallel graph analytics
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — $45/GB/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Linux
Support Tickets, Live chat, Community, Docs Email, Tickets, Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS, SSO/SAML
Integrations 10 integrations 11 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Neo4j 3/3 · TigerGraph 3/3
ACID transactions ✓ ✓
Graph algorithms ✓ ✓
Vector search ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Query languages Cypher, GQL GSQL, openCypher, GQL
Included storage 2 GB Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Native property graphs with Cypher and full ACID transactions
  • Graph algorithms, vector indexes, and machine-learning pipelines
  • Managed and self-managed deployment across major cloud platforms
  • Distributed native parallel graph processing for highly connected data
  • Hybrid graph and vector search with graph algorithms and AI/ML tools
  • Managed cloud and self-managed Linux, Docker, or Kubernetes deployment
Cons
  • Professional requires a minimum 1GB cluster
  • Business Critical requires a minimum 2GB cluster
  • Virtual Dedicated Cloud pricing requires contacting sales
  • Savanna pricing is usage-based and storage is billed separately
  • Advanced capacity and availability features require higher-tier plans
  • The platform may exceed the needs of teams seeking a narrow graph database
Our verdict

Neo4j is a native graph database for developers, data scientists, and organizations working with connected data. It stores nodes, relationships, and properties, with use cases including analytics, recommendations, fraud detection,…

Read the review →

TigerGraph is a distributed graph database and analytics platform for enterprises working with highly connected data. It supports real-time graph updates, massively parallel processing, graph algorithms, GSQL, OpenCypher, and GQL, along…

Read the review →
  1. Neo4jGraph Databases 9.4Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. TigerGraphGraph Databases 8.7Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Neo4j — where it wins

    • Native property graphs with Cypher and full ACID transactions
    • Graph algorithms, vector indexes, and machine-learning pipelines
    • Managed and self-managed deployment across major cloud platforms

    Where it doesn't

    • Professional requires a minimum 1GB cluster
    • Business Critical requires a minimum 2GB cluster
    • Virtual Dedicated Cloud pricing requires contacting sales
  • TigerGraph — where it wins

    • Distributed native parallel graph processing for highly connected data
    • Hybrid graph and vector search with graph algorithms and AI/ML tools
    • Managed cloud and self-managed Linux, Docker, or Kubernetes deployment

    Where it doesn't

    • Savanna pricing is usage-based and storage is billed separately
    • Advanced capacity and availability features require higher-tier plans
    • The platform may exceed the needs of teams seeking a narrow graph database
  • Neo4j9.4/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A broad graph platform spanning managed cloud, self-managed deployments, analytics, and AI.

    Visit Neo4jFull verdict →
  • TigerGraph8.7/10 · Free plan

    A distributed graph platform for large-scale analytics, search, algorithms, and AI workloads.

    Visit TigerGraphFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update