Mobexa vs Oversecured

Mobexa8.6Visit Oversecured8.5Visit

Higher score Mobexa #8 in Mobile Application Security Testing Software 8.6/10 Paid ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Mobexa

vs

Oversecured #9 in Mobile Application Security Testing Software 8.5/10 Paid ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Oversecured

• Mobexa fits best

  Small teams needing hybrid controls and exports

• Oversecured fits best

  Teams needing evidence-rich attack-path testing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Mobexa 8.6/10 Visit ↗	Oversecured 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.6	8.5
Ranking	#8 in Mobile Application Security Testing Software	#9 in Mobile Application Security Testing Software
Best for	Small teams needing hybrid controls and exports	Teams needing evidence-rich attack-path testing
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	€2,346/yr	$1,000/unit/mo
Free plan	—	—
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud, Self-hosted	Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms	Web	Web
Support	Email · 24/7	Email, Live chat, Phone, Docs
Compliance	SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA	GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS
Integrations	12 integrations	10 integrations
Built for	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Mobexa 3/3 · Oversecured 3/3
Static binary analysis	✓	✓
Dynamic app analysis	✓	✓
Sensitive-data flow	✓	✓
Specs
Mobile platforms	Both	Both
Deployment model	Hybrid	Hybrid
Included apps	2	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Combines static, dynamic and runtime analysis for Android and iOS Exports findings as PDF, JSON, SARIF, CycloneDX and SPDX Supports CI/CD, SIEM, SSO, RBAC and hybrid deployment	Combines static, dynamic, post-login, taint, and data-flow analysis Provides proofs of concept, stack traces, and device screencasts Supports CI/CD, REST API, CLI, MCP, compliance, and report exports
Cons	Starter is limited to 2 production applications Starter allows up to 8 scans per month Business and Enterprise pricing may challenge smaller budgets	No unlimited free plan is listed iOS static analysis requires source code Business pricing is $1,000 per app per month
Our verdict	Mobexa is a mobile application security testing platform for engineering, application-security and compliance teams. It analyzes Android and iOS applications through static analysis of source and bytecode, dynamic analysis on emulated… Read the review →	Oversecured is a software-as-a-service platform for testing Android and iOS applications for security vulnerabilities. It is designed for developers, security teams, and organizations managing mobile applications across startup,… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Mobexa — where it wins

  • Combines static, dynamic and runtime analysis for Android and iOS
  • Exports findings as PDF, JSON, SARIF, CycloneDX and SPDX
  • Supports CI/CD, SIEM, SSO, RBAC and hybrid deployment

  Where it doesn't

  • Starter is limited to 2 production applications
  • Starter allows up to 8 scans per month
  • Business and Enterprise pricing may challenge smaller budgets

• Oversecured — where it wins

  • Combines static, dynamic, post-login, taint, and data-flow analysis
  • Provides proofs of concept, stack traces, and device screencasts
  • Supports CI/CD, REST API, CLI, MCP, compliance, and report exports

  Where it doesn't

  • No unlimited free plan is listed
  • iOS static analysis requires source code
  • Business pricing is $1,000 per app per month

• Mobexa8.6/10 · Paid

  A hybrid mobile security platform with broad analysis, evidence, exports and enterprise controls.

  Visit MobexaFull verdict →
• Oversecured8.5/10 · Paid

  Evidence-rich Android and iOS security testing for development and security teams.

  Visit OversecuredFull verdict →