Quokka vs Mobexa

Quokka8.9Visit Mobexa8.6Visit

Higher score Quokka #5 in Mobile Application Security Testing Software 8.9/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Quokka

vs

Mobexa #8 in Mobile Application Security Testing Software 8.6/10 Paid ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Mobexa

• Quokka fits best

  Binary-first enterprise mobile AppSec

• Mobexa fits best

  Small teams needing hybrid controls and exports

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Quokka 8.9/10 Visit ↗	Mobexa 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.9	8.6
Ranking	#5 in Mobile Application Security Testing Software	#8 in Mobile Application Security Testing Software
Best for	Binary-first enterprise mobile AppSec	Small teams needing hybrid controls and exports
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	Pricing on request · 30-day trial	€2,346/yr
Free plan	Not checked yet	—
Free trial	30 days	—
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms	Web	Web
Support	Docs	Email · 24/7
Compliance	SOC 2	SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA
Integrations	10 integrations	12 integrations
Built for	Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Quokka 3/3 · Mobexa 3/3
Static binary analysis	✓	✓
Dynamic app analysis	✓	✓
Sensitive-data flow	✓	✓
Specs
Mobile platforms	Both	Both
Deployment model	Cloud	Hybrid
Included apps	Not checked yet	2
Our review
Pros	Analyzes compiled or obfuscated binaries without source code Combines static, dynamic, interactive, and forced-path testing Covers supply-chain risk, SBOMs, sensitive data, and compliance mapping	Combines static, dynamic and runtime analysis for Android and iOS Exports findings as PDF, JSON, SARIF, CycloneDX and SPDX Supports CI/CD, SIEM, SSO, RBAC and hybrid deployment
Cons	Paid pricing requires contacting sales Cloud deployment may not suit on-premises requirements Support channels are limited to documentation	Starter is limited to 2 production applications Starter allows up to 8 scans per month Business and Enterprise pricing may challenge smaller budgets
Our verdict	Quokka provides mobile application security testing and risk intelligence for enterprises, government agencies, regulated organizations, and DevSecOps teams. Its Q-mast product analyzes iOS and Android applications, including compiled or… Read the review →	Mobexa is a mobile application security testing platform for engineering, application-security and compliance teams. It analyzes Android and iOS applications through static analysis of source and bytecode, dynamic analysis on emulated… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Quokka — where it wins

  • Analyzes compiled or obfuscated binaries without source code
  • Combines static, dynamic, interactive, and forced-path testing
  • Covers supply-chain risk, SBOMs, sensitive data, and compliance mapping

  Where it doesn't

  • Paid pricing requires contacting sales
  • Cloud deployment may not suit on-premises requirements
  • Support channels are limited to documentation

• Mobexa — where it wins

  • Combines static, dynamic and runtime analysis for Android and iOS
  • Exports findings as PDF, JSON, SARIF, CycloneDX and SPDX
  • Supports CI/CD, SIEM, SSO, RBAC and hybrid deployment

  Where it doesn't

  • Starter is limited to 2 production applications
  • Starter allows up to 8 scans per month
  • Business and Enterprise pricing may challenge smaller budgets

• Quokka8.9/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

  Binary-first mobile AppSec with deep analysis, broad integrations, and contact-sales pricing.

  Visit QuokkaFull verdict →
• Mobexa8.6/10 · Paid

  A hybrid mobile security platform with broad analysis, evidence, exports and enterprise controls.

  Visit MobexaFull verdict →