Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Computer-Assisted Translation Software

Matecat vs Centus

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Matecat #6 in Computer-Assisted Translation Software 6.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 5 features Visit Matecat
Centus #8 in Computer-Assisted Translation Software 6.8/10 From $145/mo · 14-day trial ✓ 2 of 5 features Visit Centus

Matecat leads on 1 check, Centus on 1, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free planonly Matecat
  • Most featuresCentus · 2 of 5

Matecat and Centus score identically on our rubric (6.8 out of 10) for computer-assisted translation software; Matecat sits at #6 and Centus at #8 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

Matecat offers free plan; Centus doesn't. Centus offers terminology management; Matecat doesn't publish it.

Matecat is the better fit for free CAT work with broad language and format coverage. Centus is the better fit for localization teams needing integrations and automation.

  • Matecat fits best

    Free CAT work with broad language and format coverage

  • Centus fits best

    Localization teams needing integrations and automation

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Matecat 6.8/10 Visit ↗ Centus 6.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 6.8 6.8
Ranking #6 in Computer-Assisted Translation Software #8 in Computer-Assisted Translation Software
Best for Free CAT work with broad language and format coverage Localization teams needing integrations and automation
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android
Support Email, Docs Phone, Docs · 24/7
Integrations 1 integrations 15 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Matecat 1/5 · Centus 2/5
Translation memory ✓ ✓
Terminology management Not published ✓ (best)
QA checks Not published Not published
Alignment tool Not published Not published
Offline desktop use Not published Not published
Specs
Deployment model Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Supports more than 200 languages and 80 file formats
  • Includes translation memory, termbases, and terminology quality checks
  • Offers REST APIs, WPML integration, and self-hosting options
  • Translation memory, glossaries, terminology, and automated QA
  • API, CLI, code synchronization, and many localization integrations
  • Collaborative workflows with reporting and progress tracking
Cons
  • Its listed integration coverage names WPML rather than multiple platforms
  • Self-hosting and customization require technical ownership
  • Its workflow is centered on browser, API, and self-hosted deployments
  • Starts at $145 per month with no free plan
  • Higher tiers are needed for machine translation and larger limits
  • Enterprise pricing uses custom limits and contact-sales pricing
Our verdict

Matecat is a free, open-source computer-assisted translation tool for professional translators, language service providers, companies, and enterprise users. It runs in a web browser, supports uploaded document files, and covers translation…

Read the review →

Centus is a cloud-based translation management platform for localization managers, translators, developers, designers, and growing businesses. It supports collaborative translation, computer-assisted translation, translation memory,…

Read the review →
  1. MatecatComputer-Assisted Translation Software 6.8Free plan
  2. CentusComputer-Assisted Translation Software 6.8From $145/mo · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Matecat — where it wins

    • Supports more than 200 languages and 80 file formats
    • Includes translation memory, termbases, and terminology quality checks
    • Offers REST APIs, WPML integration, and self-hosting options

    Where it doesn't

    • Its listed integration coverage names WPML rather than multiple platforms
    • Self-hosting and customization require technical ownership
    • Its workflow is centered on browser, API, and self-hosted deployments
  • Centus — where it wins

    • Translation memory, glossaries, terminology, and automated QA
    • API, CLI, code synchronization, and many localization integrations
    • Collaborative workflows with reporting and progress tracking

    Where it doesn't

    • Starts at $145 per month with no free plan
    • Higher tiers are needed for machine translation and larger limits
    • Enterprise pricing uses custom limits and contact-sales pricing
  • Matecat6.8/10 · Free plan

    A free CAT workspace with broad language, file-format, memory, and API coverage.

    Visit MatecatFull verdict →
  • Centus6.8/10 · From $145/mo · 14-day trial

    Centus suits localization teams that need automation, integrations, and developer access.

    Visit CentusFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update