Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Container Runtime Software

LXC vs Incus

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score LXC #5 in Container Runtime Software 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 4 features Visit LXC
Incus #7 in Container Runtime Software 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 4 features Visit Incus

LXC leads on 0 checks, Incus on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreLXC · 8.7/10
  • Free planboth

LXC scores higher on our rubric for container runtime software: 8.7 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

LXC is the better fit for linux system containers. Incus is the better fit for linux system containers and virtual machines.

  • LXC fits best

    Linux system containers

  • Incus fits best

    Linux system containers and virtual machines

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature LXC 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Incus 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.5
Ranking #5 in Container Runtime Software #7 in Container Runtime Software
Best for Linux system containers Linux system containers and virtual machines
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs, Email Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features LXC 1/4 · Incus 1/4
Rootless mode ✓ ✓
OCI support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Desktop GUI Not checked yet Not checked yet
Windows containers Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Runtime mode Not checked yet Not checked yet
Host platforms Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Unprivileged containers with user namespaces and UID/GID mappings
  • Deep Linux isolation through namespaces, cgroups, and security controls
  • Stable C API, language bindings, networking, images, and packaging
  • Combines system containers, OCI applications, and virtual machines
  • Adds clustering, snapshots, migration, storage, and network management
  • Integrates with Ansible, Terraform, OpenTofu, Packer, and Kubernetes Cluster API
Cons
  • Linux hosts only
  • Low-level runtime requires more platform knowledge than hosted tools
  • Does not establish Kubernetes CRI or core OCI/Docker image support
  • The Incus daemon runs on Linux
  • Windows and macOS support is for clients, not the server
  • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of app-container-only deployments
Our verdict

LXC is an open-source userspace interface for Linux kernel containment features, aimed at teams and developers who need system or application containers on Linux hosts. It provides command-line tools, an API, language bindings,…

Read the review →

Incus is an open-source manager for system containers, OCI application containers, and virtual machines. It is aimed at developers, infrastructure teams, and production environments that need to run and manage Linux systems or virtual…

Read the review →
  1. LXCContainer Runtime Software 8.7Free plan
  2. IncusContainer Runtime Software 8.5Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • LXC — where it wins

    • Unprivileged containers with user namespaces and UID/GID mappings
    • Deep Linux isolation through namespaces, cgroups, and security controls
    • Stable C API, language bindings, networking, images, and packaging

    Where it doesn't

    • Linux hosts only
    • Low-level runtime requires more platform knowledge than hosted tools
    • Does not establish Kubernetes CRI or core OCI/Docker image support
  • Incus — where it wins

    • Combines system containers, OCI applications, and virtual machines
    • Adds clustering, snapshots, migration, storage, and network management
    • Integrates with Ansible, Terraform, OpenTofu, Packer, and Kubernetes Cluster API

    Where it doesn't

    • The Incus daemon runs on Linux
    • Windows and macOS support is for clients, not the server
    • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of app-container-only deployments
  • LXC8.7/10 · Free plan

    A mature, open-source choice for Linux system containers and host-level control.

    Visit LXCFull verdict →
  • Incus8.5/10 · Free plan

    A broad Linux-focused runtime for system containers, OCI apps, and virtual machines.

    Visit IncusFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update