Head-to-head · Cloud Storage Gateway Software
LucidLink vs ObjectiveFS
LucidLink leads on 1 check, ObjectiveFS on 1, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreLucidLink · 8.8/10
- Lowest starting priceLucidLink · $7/user/mo
- Free trialboth
- Most featuresObjectiveFS · 3 of 3
LucidLink scores higher on our rubric for cloud storage gateway software: 8.8 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #12.
LucidLink is cheaper to start at $7/mo against $99/mo. On deployment model, ObjectiveFS gives you Hybrid where LucidLink offers Cloud. ObjectiveFS offers edge synchronization; LucidLink doesn't.
LucidLink is the better fit for creative teams streaming shared cloud files. ObjectiveFS is the better fit for technical teams needing POSIX cloud filesystems.
- LucidLink fits best
Creative teams streaming shared cloud files
- ObjectiveFS fits best
Technical teams needing POSIX cloud filesystems
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | LucidLink 8.8/10 Visit ↗ | ObjectiveFS 7.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Ranking | #5 in Cloud Storage Gateway Software | #12 in Cloud Storage Gateway Software |
| Best for | Creative teams streaming shared cloud files | Technical teams needing POSIX cloud filesystems |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $7/user/mo (best) | $99/mo |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | 30 days | 14 days |
| Free trial length | 30 days · no card needed | 14 days · no card needed |
| Deployment | Cloud, Desktop, Mobile | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Linux, macOS |
| Support | Email, Live chat, Tickets, Community, Docs | Email, Phone, Docs |
| Integrations | 8 integrations | 13 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features LucidLink 2/3 · ObjectiveFS 3/3 | ||
| Global namespace | ✓ | ✓ |
| Local caching | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge synchronization | — | ✓ (best) |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment model | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Supported protocols | S3-compatible object storage | FUSE, NFS, SMB |
| Cloud storage targets | AWS S3, AWS GovCloud, Microsoft Azure, Backblaze, Cloudian, Dell, Google Cloud, IBM Cloud, Zadara, Nutanix Objects, Scality, Telefonica, Oracle Cloud, Wasabi, Alibaba Cloud | Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage, Oracle Cloud, DigitalOcean Spaces, Scaleway, Wasabi, Ceph, MinIO, NetApp StorageGRID, Hitachi Content Platform, S3-compatible object stores |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | LucidLink provides a cloud-native shared filespace that presents cloud content like a local drive while streaming files on demand. It is designed for distributed teams working with large video, CAD, 3D, and other files, including media,… Read the review → |
ObjectiveFS is a distributed, POSIX-compliant FUSE filesystem for Linux and macOS. It uses cloud or on-premise object storage as its backend while presenting shared file access to cloud instances, containers, laptops, office servers, web… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
LucidLink — where it wins
- Streams large files on demand without full device synchronization
- Supports real-time collaboration, snapshots, audit logs, and permissions
- Connects with major cloud storage and creative-workflow platforms
Where it doesn't
- Starter limits teams to one filespace and 10 members
- Business pricing rises to $27 per user monthly
- Edge synchronization is not supported
ObjectiveFS — where it wins
- POSIX-compliant filesystem with concurrent access across mounted machines
- Supports caching, snapshots, encryption, and data-integrity checks
- Connects to major object stores, including Amazon S3 and Azure Blob Storage
Where it doesn't
- Paid plans start at $99 per month
- Runs on Linux and macOS only
- Advanced capabilities are reserved for higher paid tiers
- LucidLink8.8/10 · 30-day trial
A local-drive-like cloud filespace for streaming and collaborating on large files.
Visit LucidLinkFull verdict → - ObjectiveFS7.9/10 · 14-day trial
ObjectiveFS brings shared POSIX file access, caching, snapshots, and encryption to object storage.
Visit ObjectiveFSFull verdict →
More comparisons
- CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs LucidLink
- Nasuni File Data Platform vs LucidLink
- Panzura CloudFS vs LucidLink
- AWS Storage Gateway vs LucidLink
- LucidLink vs Tiger Bridge
- LucidLink vs Peer Global File Service
- LucidLink vs Quantum StorNext
All cloud storage gateway software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update








