Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Performance Testing Software

Locust vs Artillery

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Locust #7 in Performance Testing Software 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Locust
Artillery #16 in Performance Testing Software 7.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Artillery

Locust leads on 0 checks, Artillery on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreLocust · 8.8/10
  • Free planboth

Locust scores higher on our rubric for performance testing software: 8.8 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #16.

Locust is the better fit for python teams building flexible open-source tests. Artillery is the better fit for teams testing APIs, browsers, and WebSockets.

  • Locust fits best

    Python teams building flexible open-source tests

  • Artillery fits best

    Teams testing APIs, browsers, and WebSockets

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Locust 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Artillery 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 7.8
Ranking #7 in Performance Testing Software #16 in Performance Testing Software
Best for Python teams building flexible open-source tests Teams testing APIs, browsers, and WebSockets
Pricing model Free Free plan + paid
Starting price Free plan $199/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs Email, Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Locust 5/5 · Artillery 5/5
Load testing ✓ ✓
Stress testing ✓ ✓
Browser-based testing ✓ ✓
Distributed load ✓ ✓
API testing ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Hybrid
Max virtual users Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Define test scenarios in regular Python code
  • Run real-time, headless, or distributed tests
  • Extend workloads with protocols, clients, and integrations
  • Tests HTTP, WebSocket, Socket.IO, and Playwright browser workloads
  • Runs distributed tests through AWS Lambda, AWS Fargate, and Azure
  • Connects with CI/CD, observability tools, dashboards, and cloud reports
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment places operations on your team
  • Browser testing uses documented Playwright or Selenium extensions
  • Core HTTP/HTTPS coverage may require extensions for other protocols
  • Free plan limits teams to 30 reports and 30-minute tests monthly
  • Paid plans start at $199 per month
  • The broad feature set may exceed the needs of basic API testing
Our verdict

Locust is an open-source performance and load testing tool for developers and test engineers who want to define simulated behavior in Python. It supports load, stress, browser, distributed-load, and API testing across web, Windows, macOS,…

Read the review →

Artillery is a performance testing platform for developers, QA engineers, and SRE teams. Its CLI supports load and stress testing for APIs, web applications, and network services across HTTP, WebSocket, and Socket.IO. Playwright-based…

Read the review →
  1. LocustPerformance Testing Software 8.8Free plan
  2. ArtilleryPerformance Testing Software 7.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Locust — where it wins

    • Define test scenarios in regular Python code
    • Run real-time, headless, or distributed tests
    • Extend workloads with protocols, clients, and integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment places operations on your team
    • Browser testing uses documented Playwright or Selenium extensions
    • Core HTTP/HTTPS coverage may require extensions for other protocols
  • Artillery — where it wins

    • Tests HTTP, WebSocket, Socket.IO, and Playwright browser workloads
    • Runs distributed tests through AWS Lambda, AWS Fargate, and Azure
    • Connects with CI/CD, observability tools, dashboards, and cloud reports

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan limits teams to 30 reports and 30-minute tests monthly
    • Paid plans start at $199 per month
    • The broad feature set may exceed the needs of basic API testing
  • Locust8.8/10 · Free plan

    A flexible Python-based load testing tool for teams that want self-hosted control.

    Visit LocustFull verdict →
  • Artillery7.8/10 · Free plan

    A flexible performance testing platform spanning APIs, browsers, WebSockets, and distributed execution.

    Visit ArtilleryFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update