Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Performance Testing Software

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering vs Locust

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering #6 in Performance Testing Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit OpenText
Locust #7 in Performance Testing Software 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Locust

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering leads on 0 checks, Locust on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly Locust

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering scores higher on our rubric for performance testing software: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #7.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is the better fit for enterprises needing centralized performance engineering. Locust is the better fit for python teams building flexible open-source tests.

  • OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering fits best

    Enterprises needing centralized performance engineering

  • Locust fits best

    Python teams building flexible open-source tests

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Locust 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.8
Ranking #6 in Performance Testing Software #7 in Performance Testing Software
Best for Enterprises needing centralized performance engineering Python teams building flexible open-source tests
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price Pricing on request Free plan
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community Docs
Built for Enterprise, Mid-market Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering 5/5 · Locust 5/5
Load testing ✓ ✓
Stress testing ✓ ✓
Browser-based testing ✓ ✓
Distributed load ✓ ✓
API testing ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Hybrid
Max virtual users Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports more than 50 protocols and technologies
  • Runs distributed loads across cloud and on-premises environments
  • Connects with major CI/CD, cloud, container, and testing tools
  • Define test scenarios in regular Python code
  • Run real-time, headless, or distributed tests
  • Extend workloads with protocols, clients, and integrations
Cons
  • Paid purchasing is handled through sales
  • Community bundle is limited to proof-of-concept or non-production testing
  • Community bundle supports 50 virtual users for most protocols
  • Self-hosted deployment places operations on your team
  • Browser testing uses documented Playwright or Selenium extensions
  • Core HTTP/HTTPS coverage may require extensions for other protocols
Our verdict

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is a web-based performance testing platform for enterprise QA, development, and performance engineering teams. Formerly LoadRunner Enterprise, it centralizes test planning, scripting, execution,…

Read the review →

Locust is an open-source performance and load testing tool for developers and test engineers who want to define simulated behavior in Python. It supports load, stress, browser, distributed-load, and API testing across web, Windows, macOS,…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Enterprise Performance EngineeringPerformance Testing Software 9.0Pricing on request
  2. LocustPerformance Testing Software 8.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering — where it wins

    • Supports more than 50 protocols and technologies
    • Runs distributed loads across cloud and on-premises environments
    • Connects with major CI/CD, cloud, container, and testing tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid purchasing is handled through sales
    • Community bundle is limited to proof-of-concept or non-production testing
    • Community bundle supports 50 virtual users for most protocols
  • Locust — where it wins

    • Define test scenarios in regular Python code
    • Run real-time, headless, or distributed tests
    • Extend workloads with protocols, clients, and integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment places operations on your team
    • Browser testing uses documented Playwright or Selenium extensions
    • Core HTTP/HTTPS coverage may require extensions for other protocols
  • OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad, governance-focused platform for enterprise performance engineering at scale.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • Locust8.8/10 · Free plan

    A flexible Python-based load testing tool for teams that want self-hosted control.

    Visit LocustFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update