Head-to-head · Performance Testing Software
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering vs Locust
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering leads on 0 checks, Locust on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreOpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering · 9.0/10
- Free planonly Locust
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering scores higher on our rubric for performance testing software: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #7.
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is the better fit for enterprises needing centralized performance engineering. Locust is the better fit for python teams building flexible open-source tests.
- OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering fits best
Enterprises needing centralized performance engineering
- Locust fits best
Python teams building flexible open-source tests
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | Locust 8.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Ranking | #6 in Performance Testing Software | #7 in Performance Testing Software |
| Best for | Enterprises needing centralized performance engineering | Python teams building flexible open-source tests |
| Pricing model | Paid | Free |
| Starting price | Pricing on request | Free plan |
| Free plan | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, Linux | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Community | Docs |
| Built for | Enterprise, Mid-market | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering 5/5 · Locust 5/5 | ||
| Load testing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stress testing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Browser-based testing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Distributed load | ✓ | ✓ |
| API testing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment model | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Max virtual users | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is a web-based performance testing platform for enterprise QA, development, and performance engineering teams. Formerly LoadRunner Enterprise, it centralizes test planning, scripting, execution,… Read the review → |
Locust is an open-source performance and load testing tool for developers and test engineers who want to define simulated behavior in Python. It supports load, stress, browser, distributed-load, and API testing across web, Windows, macOS,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering — where it wins
- Supports more than 50 protocols and technologies
- Runs distributed loads across cloud and on-premises environments
- Connects with major CI/CD, cloud, container, and testing tools
Where it doesn't
- Paid purchasing is handled through sales
- Community bundle is limited to proof-of-concept or non-production testing
- Community bundle supports 50 virtual users for most protocols
Locust — where it wins
- Define test scenarios in regular Python code
- Run real-time, headless, or distributed tests
- Extend workloads with protocols, clients, and integrations
Where it doesn't
- Self-hosted deployment places operations on your team
- Browser testing uses documented Playwright or Selenium extensions
- Core HTTP/HTTPS coverage may require extensions for other protocols
- OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering9.0/10 · Pricing on request
A broad, governance-focused platform for enterprise performance engineering at scale.
Visit OpenTextFull verdict → - Locust8.8/10 · Free plan
A flexible Python-based load testing tool for teams that want self-hosted control.
Visit LocustFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Grafana k6 vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering
- Grafana k6 vs Locust
- OpenText Core Performance Engineering vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering
- OpenText Core Performance Engineering vs Locust
- Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering
- Apache JMeter vs Locust
- Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering
- Akamai CloudTest vs Locust
All performance testing software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update



