Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · AI Voice Agents

LiveKit Agents vs Pipecat

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score LiveKit Agents #3 in AI Voice Agents 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit LiveKit
Pipecat #4 in AI Voice Agents 9.1/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Pipecat

LiveKit Agents leads on 0 checks, Pipecat on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreLiveKit Agents · 9.2/10
  • Free planonly LiveKit Agents

LiveKit Agents scores higher on our rubric for ai voice agents: 9.2 against 9.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

LiveKit Agents is the better fit for developers building realtime voice agents. Pipecat is the better fit for teams building composable voice pipelines.

  • LiveKit Agents fits best

    Developers building realtime voice agents

  • Pipecat fits best

    Teams building composable voice pipelines

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature LiveKit Agents 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Pipecat 9.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 9.1
Ranking #3 in AI Voice Agents #4 in AI Voice Agents
Best for Developers building realtime voice agents Teams building composable voice pipelines
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price $50/mo Free
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud, Mobile, Self-hosted
Integrations 11 integrations 12 integrations
Features LiveKit Agents 4/4 · Pipecat 4/4
Inbound calls ✓ ✓
Outbound calls ✓ ✓
Human handoff ✓ ✓
Custom phone numbers ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported languages Not checked yet Not checked yet
Concurrent calls 20 calls Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Connects pluggable LLM, STT, TTS, and realtime model providers
  • Supports inbound and outbound telephony, transfers, and agent handoffs
  • Includes testing, recordings, transcripts, traces, and logs
  • Combines audio, video, text, image, AI-service, and transport components
  • Supports multi-agent handoffs, parallel execution, and PSTN/SIP calling
  • Offers CLI deployment workflows plus metrics, traces, and OpenTelemetry
Cons
  • Building with the framework requires developer-led implementation
  • Ship starts at $50/month; Scale is $500/month
  • The listed feature set may be broader than needed for simple voice bots
  • Building agents requires assembling pipeline components
  • Pipecat Cloud hosting is priced per active agent minute
  • The listed Cloud profiles range from voice-only to voice-and-video workloads
Our verdict

LiveKit Agents is an open-source framework for building programmable, realtime voice and multimodal AI agents. It is aimed at developers and teams creating conversational voice applications or other realtime AI experiences. Agents can run…

Read the review →

Pipecat is an open-source Python framework for developers building real-time voice and multimodal conversational agents. Its composable pipelines cover speech recognition, language models, text-to-speech, transport, tools, and conversation…

Read the review →
  1. LiveKit AgentsAI Voice Agents 9.2Free plan
  2. PipecatAI Voice Agents 9.1Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • LiveKit Agents — where it wins

    • Connects pluggable LLM, STT, TTS, and realtime model providers
    • Supports inbound and outbound telephony, transfers, and agent handoffs
    • Includes testing, recordings, transcripts, traces, and logs

    Where it doesn't

    • Building with the framework requires developer-led implementation
    • Ship starts at $50/month; Scale is $500/month
    • The listed feature set may be broader than needed for simple voice bots
  • Pipecat — where it wins

    • Combines audio, video, text, image, AI-service, and transport components
    • Supports multi-agent handoffs, parallel execution, and PSTN/SIP calling
    • Offers CLI deployment workflows plus metrics, traces, and OpenTelemetry

    Where it doesn't

    • Building agents requires assembling pipeline components
    • Pipecat Cloud hosting is priced per active agent minute
    • The listed Cloud profiles range from voice-only to voice-and-video workloads
  • LiveKit Agents9.2/10 · Free plan

    An open framework for building realtime voice agents, with optional managed cloud plans.

    Visit LiveKitFull verdict →
  • Pipecat9.1/10 · Open source

    A composable Python framework for building and deploying voice and multimodal agents.

    Visit PipecatFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update