Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Zero Trust Network Access Software

Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access vs Forcepoint ZTNA

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access #6 in Zero Trust Network Access Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Ivanti
Forcepoint ZTNA #7 in Zero Trust Network Access Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Forcepoint

Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access leads on 0 checks, Forcepoint ZTNA on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreIvanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access · 8.7/10
  • Most featuresIvanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access · 3 of 3

Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access scores higher on our rubric for zero trust network access software: 8.7 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #7.

Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access is the better fit for organizations needing hybrid application publishing. Forcepoint ZTNA is the better fit for teams prioritizing private-app data protection.

  • Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access fits best

    Organizations needing hybrid application publishing

  • Forcepoint ZTNA fits best

    Teams prioritizing private-app data protection

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Forcepoint ZTNA 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.6
Ranking #6 in Zero Trust Network Access Software #7 in Zero Trust Network Access Software
Best for Organizations needing hybrid application publishing Teams prioritizing private-app data protection
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS
Support Docs Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs
Integrations 5 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access 3/3 · Forcepoint ZTNA 1/3
Device posture checks ✓ ✓
SIEM log export ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Session recording ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Hybrid
Access methods Both Both
Private app connectors Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported app protocols HTTP, HTTPS, TCP, UDP, SSH, RDP, ICA SSH, RDP, HTTP, HTTPS, SMB, SFTP
Our review
Pros
  • Continuous verification covers users, devices, applications, and risk.
  • Publishes private applications through groups and hybrid gateways.
  • Supports HTTP, HTTPS, TCP, UDP, SSH, RDP, and ICA access.
  • Agentless web and agent-based non-web application access
  • Contextual policies use user, device, location, and behavior signals
  • DLP, malware scanning, MFA escalation, and unified reporting
Cons
  • Pricing uses a contact-sales model rather than published tiers.
  • Customer-deployed gateways add infrastructure planning to deployment.
  • Its enterprise feature set may exceed simpler remote-access needs.
  • Non-web agent access is described for managed Windows and macOS devices
  • Deployment requires connectors in private environments
  • Pricing uses a contact-sales model
Our verdict

Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access is a cloud-based SaaS platform for enterprise zero-trust authentication and access control. It evaluates user identity, device posture, application context, and risk before granting access to private,…

Read the review →

Forcepoint ZTNA provides controlled remote access to private applications hosted in internal data centers and private clouds. It is designed for organizations that need to protect private-application data while supporting both…

Read the review →
  1. Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust AccessZero Trust Network Access Software 8.7Pricing on request
  2. Forcepoint ZTNAZero Trust Network Access Software 8.6Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access — where it wins

    • Continuous verification covers users, devices, applications, and risk.
    • Publishes private applications through groups and hybrid gateways.
    • Supports HTTP, HTTPS, TCP, UDP, SSH, RDP, and ICA access.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing uses a contact-sales model rather than published tiers.
    • Customer-deployed gateways add infrastructure planning to deployment.
    • Its enterprise feature set may exceed simpler remote-access needs.
  • Forcepoint ZTNA — where it wins

    • Agentless web and agent-based non-web application access
    • Contextual policies use user, device, location, and behavior signals
    • DLP, malware scanning, MFA escalation, and unified reporting

    Where it doesn't

    • Non-web agent access is described for managed Windows and macOS devices
    • Deployment requires connectors in private environments
    • Pricing uses a contact-sales model
  • Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access8.7/10 · Pricing on request

    A hybrid ZTNA platform with granular policies, posture checks, and broad protocol support.

    Visit IvantiFull verdict →
  • Forcepoint ZTNA8.6/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused ZTNA option for protecting private-app data with contextual controls.

    Visit ForcepointFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update