Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Zero Trust Network Access Software

AWS Verified Access vs Forcepoint ZTNA

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score AWS Verified Access #4 in Zero Trust Network Access Software 8.9/10 Paid ✓ 2 of 3 features Visit site
Forcepoint ZTNA #7 in Zero Trust Network Access Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Forcepoint

AWS Verified Access leads on 0 checks, Forcepoint ZTNA on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAWS Verified Access · 8.9/10
  • Most featuresAWS Verified Access · 2 of 3

AWS Verified Access scores higher on our rubric for zero trust network access software: 8.9 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.

On deployment model, Forcepoint ZTNA gives you Hybrid where AWS Verified Access offers Cloud.

AWS Verified Access is the better fit for AWS-centric teams with usage-based pricing. Forcepoint ZTNA is the better fit for teams prioritizing private-app data protection.

  • AWS Verified Access fits best

    AWS-centric teams with usage-based pricing

  • Forcepoint ZTNA fits best

    Teams prioritizing private-app data protection

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature AWS Verified Access 8.9/10 Visit ↗ Forcepoint ZTNA 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.6
Ranking #4 in Zero Trust Network Access Software #7 in Zero Trust Network Access Software
Best for AWS-centric teams with usage-based pricing Teams prioritizing private-app data protection
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $0.001/unit usage-based Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Desktop, Browser extension, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Windows, macOS
Support Docs, Tickets, Community Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs
Integrations 10 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features AWS Verified Access 2/3 · Forcepoint ZTNA 1/3
Device posture checks ✓ ✓
SIEM log export ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Session recording Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Cloud Hybrid
Access methods Both Both
Private app connectors Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported app protocols HTTP(S), TCP, SSH, RDP SSH, RDP, HTTP, HTTPS, SMB, SFTP
Our review
Pros
  • Per-request authorization uses identity and device context
  • Supports HTTP(S), TCP, SSH, and RDP access methods
  • Exports OCSF logs to S3, CloudWatch Logs, and Kinesis
  • Agentless web and agent-based non-web application access
  • Contextual policies use user, device, location, and behavior signals
  • DLP, malware scanning, MFA escalation, and unified reporting
Cons
  • Usage-based billing spans several separate pricing meters
  • Cloud deployment centers operations on the AWS ecosystem
  • No free plan is available for smaller evaluations
  • Non-web agent access is described for managed Windows and macOS devices
  • Deployment requires connectors in private environments
  • Pricing uses a contact-sales model
Our verdict

AWS Verified Access controls access to corporate applications and infrastructure without requiring a VPN. It evaluates each request using user identity, device security state, and other trust data, then applies identity- and device-context…

Read the review →

Forcepoint ZTNA provides controlled remote access to private applications hosted in internal data centers and private clouds. It is designed for organizations that need to protect private-application data while supporting both…

Read the review →
  1. AWS Verified AccessZero Trust Network Access Software 8.9Paid
  2. Forcepoint ZTNAZero Trust Network Access Software 8.6Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • AWS Verified Access — where it wins

    • Per-request authorization uses identity and device context
    • Supports HTTP(S), TCP, SSH, and RDP access methods
    • Exports OCSF logs to S3, CloudWatch Logs, and Kinesis

    Where it doesn't

    • Usage-based billing spans several separate pricing meters
    • Cloud deployment centers operations on the AWS ecosystem
    • No free plan is available for smaller evaluations
  • Forcepoint ZTNA — where it wins

    • Agentless web and agent-based non-web application access
    • Contextual policies use user, device, location, and behavior signals
    • DLP, malware scanning, MFA escalation, and unified reporting

    Where it doesn't

    • Non-web agent access is described for managed Windows and macOS devices
    • Deployment requires connectors in private environments
    • Pricing uses a contact-sales model
  • AWS Verified Access8.9/10 · Paid

    A strong AWS-native choice for identity- and device-aware access with usage-based billing.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • Forcepoint ZTNA8.6/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused ZTNA option for protecting private-app data with contextual controls.

    Visit ForcepointFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update