Head-to-head · Threat Modeling Software
itemis SECURE vs ThreatZ
itemis SECURE leads on 0 checks, ThreatZ on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
itemis SECURE and ThreatZ score identically on our rubric (6.9 out of 10) for threat modeling software; itemis SECURE sits at #7 and ThreatZ at #8 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.
itemis SECURE is the better fit for lifecycle teams needing configurable risk analysis. ThreatZ is the better fit for automotive enterprises needing full assurance workflows.
- itemis SECURE fits best
Lifecycle teams needing configurable risk analysis
- ThreatZ fits best
Automotive enterprises needing full assurance workflows
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | itemis SECURE 6.9/10 Visit ↗ | ThreatZ 6.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 6.9 | 6.9 |
| Ranking | #7 in Threat Modeling Software | #8 in Threat Modeling Software |
| Best for | Lifecycle teams needing configurable risk analysis | Automotive enterprises needing full assurance workflows |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | Not published | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Desktop | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web, Windows | Web |
| Support | Email, Docs | |
| Integrations | 3 integrations | 30+ integrations |
| Built for | Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features itemis SECURE 4/4 · ThreatZ 4/4 | ||
| Attack-path analysis | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk prioritization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Collaborative review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Templates and frameworks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Project limit | Not published | 3 projects |
| Modeling methods | Multiple | Multiple |
| Deployment | Both | Both |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | itemis SECURE is a model-based software product for threat analysis and risk assessment across the lifecycle of technical systems. It is aimed at teams in automotive, industrial, railway, and other environments working with standards such… Read the review → |
ThreatZ is an automotive cybersecurity engineering platform for OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers. It brings system and vehicle architecture modeling, TARA, attack-path analysis, risk assessment, SBOM management, vulnerability monitoring, security… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
itemis SECURE — where it wins
- Supports TARA, attack trees, attack paths, and lifecycle analysis
- Configurable risk, impact, feasibility, threat, and controls models
- Browser collaboration with DOCX and PDF report generation
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires contact with sales
- Available on web and Windows platforms
- Toolchain integrations listed are Git, LM-X License Manager, and openXSAM
ThreatZ — where it wins
- Combines TARA, attack paths, risk assessment, SBOM and compliance work products
- Connects with Jira, GitHub, DOORS, Polarion, CodeQL and vulnerability databases
- Supports hosted private cloud, on-premise and air-gapped deployments
Where it doesn't
- Team is limited to three projects
- No free plan is available
- Professional pricing is charged per user per month
- itemis SECURE6.9/10 · Pricing on request
A configurable TARA workspace for lifecycle teams modeling threats, risks, and countermeasures.
Visit itemis SECUREFull verdict → - ThreatZ6.9/10 · From $1,199/mo (annual)
A broad automotive threat modeling suite for enterprises managing assurance across complex programs.
Visit ThreatZFull verdict →
More comparisons
- CAIRIS vs itemis SECURE
- CAIRIS vs ThreatZ
- IriusRisk vs itemis SECURE
- IriusRisk vs ThreatZ
- ThreatOpus vs itemis SECURE
- ThreatOpus vs ThreatZ
- ThreatModeler Nexus vs itemis SECURE
- ThreatModeler Nexus vs ThreatZ
All threat modeling software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update




