CYMETRIS vs itemis SECURE

CYMETRIS9.0Visit itemis SECURE8.9Visit

Higher score CYMETRIS #5 in Threat Modeling Software 9.0/10 Paid ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit CYMETRIS

vs

itemis SECURE #6 in Threat Modeling Software 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit itemis SECURE

• CYMETRIS fits best

  Automotive teams running ISO/SAE 21434 TARA

• itemis SECURE fits best

  Lifecycle teams needing configurable risk analysis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	CYMETRIS 9.0/10 Visit ↗	itemis SECURE 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.0	8.9
Ranking	#5 in Threat Modeling Software	#6 in Threat Modeling Software
Best for	Automotive teams running ISO/SAE 21434 TARA	Lifecycle teams needing configurable risk analysis
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	€99/mo	Pricing on request
Free plan	—	Not checked yet
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud, Self-hosted	Cloud, Desktop
Platforms	Web	Web, Windows
Support	Email, Tickets, Docs	Email, Docs
Integrations	6 integrations	3 integrations
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Mid-market, Enterprise
Features CYMETRIS 4/4 · itemis SECURE 4/4
Attack-path analysis	✓	✓
Risk prioritization	✓	✓
Collaborative review	✓	✓
Templates and frameworks	✓	✓
Specs
Project limit	5 projects	Not checked yet
Modeling methods	Multiple	Multiple
Deployment	Both	Both
Our review
Pros	Guided ISO/SAE 21434 TARA workflow with automatic logic checks Interactive attack-path modeling linked to architecture components Lifecycle versioning, vulnerability linkage, and collaborative review	Supports TARA, attack trees, attack paths, and lifecycle analysis Configurable risk, impact, feasibility, threat, and controls models Browser collaboration with DOCX and PDF report generation
Cons	CYMETRIS Lite allows up to five active projects No free plan is available Lite support is ticket-based rather than priority support with an SLA	Pricing requires contact with sales Available on web and Windows platforms Toolchain integrations listed are Git, LM-X License Manager, and openXSAM
Our verdict	CYMETRIS is a threat modeling and cyber risk analysis platform for security engineers, product security teams, and cybersecurity consultants. Its strongest fit is automotive product security, where guided Threat Analysis and Risk… Read the review →	itemis SECURE is a model-based software product for threat analysis and risk assessment across the lifecycle of technical systems. It is aimed at teams in automotive, industrial, railway, and other environments working with standards such… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• CYMETRIS — where it wins

  • Guided ISO/SAE 21434 TARA workflow with automatic logic checks
  • Interactive attack-path modeling linked to architecture components
  • Lifecycle versioning, vulnerability linkage, and collaborative review

  Where it doesn't

  • CYMETRIS Lite allows up to five active projects
  • No free plan is available
  • Lite support is ticket-based rather than priority support with an SLA

• itemis SECURE — where it wins

  • Supports TARA, attack trees, attack paths, and lifecycle analysis
  • Configurable risk, impact, feasibility, threat, and controls models
  • Browser collaboration with DOCX and PDF report generation

  Where it doesn't

  • Pricing requires contact with sales
  • Available on web and Windows platforms
  • Toolchain integrations listed are Git, LM-X License Manager, and openXSAM

• CYMETRIS9.0/10 · Paid

  A focused TARA platform for automotive teams managing ISO/SAE 21434 risk.

  Visit CYMETRISFull verdict →
• itemis SECURE8.9/10 · Pricing on request

  A configurable TARA workspace for lifecycle teams modeling threats, risks, and countermeasures.

  Visit itemis SECUREFull verdict →