Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · IPFS Hosting Services

Infura vs Pinata

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Infura #2 in IPFS Hosting Services 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Infura
Pinata #5 in IPFS Hosting Services 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Pinata

Infura leads on 0 checks, Pinata on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free planboth

Infura and Pinata score identically on our rubric (7.9 out of 10) for ipfs hosting services; Infura sits at #2 and Pinata at #5 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

Infura is the better fit for blockchain developers needing adjacent IPFS options. Pinata is the better fit for teams needing a mature pinning and gateway toolkit.

  • Infura fits best

    Blockchain developers needing adjacent IPFS options

  • Pinata fits best

    Teams needing a mature pinning and gateway toolkit

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Infura 7.9/10 Visit ↗ Pinata 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.9
Ranking #2 in IPFS Hosting Services #5 in IPFS Hosting Services
Best for Blockchain developers needing adjacent IPFS options Teams needing a mature pinning and gateway toolkit
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — $20/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Community, Tickets · 24/7 Email, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Infura 0/4 · Pinata 0/4
Managed gateway Not checked yet Not checked yet
Custom gateway domains Not checked yet Not checked yet
S3-compatible API Not checked yet Not checked yet
Developer API Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Included storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Gateway bandwidth Not checked yet Not checked yet
Maximum file size Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Access to 40+ supported networks through managed APIs
  • JSON-RPC, WebSocket, archive data, and Gas API capabilities
  • Free Core plan; paid tiers add throughput and support options
  • Upload, pin, and retrieve files through IPFS gateways
  • Dedicated gateways, CDN delivery, and private IPFS storage
  • APIs, webhooks, presigned URLs, analytics, and collaboration
Cons
  • The feature set centers on blockchain APIs, not IPFS hosting or pinning
  • Developer starts at $50 per month; Team is $225 per month
  • Core daily-credit figures differ between the pricing page and FAQ
  • Free plan is limited to 1GB storage and 10GB monthly bandwidth
  • Picnic starts at $20 per month
  • Cloud deployment only
Our verdict

Infura provides managed blockchain network APIs and JSON-RPC endpoints for developers building decentralized applications, crypto wallets, and exchanges. It offers WebSocket access, historical archive data querying, and a Gas API, so teams…

Read the review →

Pinata provides managed IPFS storage and delivery for developers building NFT marketplaces, DeFi applications, indexers, and other products using decentralized content. Teams can upload and pin files, retrieve them through gateways, and…

Read the review →
  1. InfuraIPFS Hosting Services 7.9Free plan
  2. PinataIPFS Hosting Services 7.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Infura — where it wins

    • Access to 40+ supported networks through managed APIs
    • JSON-RPC, WebSocket, archive data, and Gas API capabilities
    • Free Core plan; paid tiers add throughput and support options

    Where it doesn't

    • The feature set centers on blockchain APIs, not IPFS hosting or pinning
    • Developer starts at $50 per month; Team is $225 per month
    • Core daily-credit figures differ between the pricing page and FAQ
  • Pinata — where it wins

    • Upload, pin, and retrieve files through IPFS gateways
    • Dedicated gateways, CDN delivery, and private IPFS storage
    • APIs, webhooks, presigned URLs, analytics, and collaboration

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 1GB storage and 10GB monthly bandwidth
    • Picnic starts at $20 per month
    • Cloud deployment only

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update