Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Attack Surface Management Software

Group-IB Attack Surface Management vs Check Point External Risk Management

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Group-IB Attack Surface Management #5 in Attack Surface Management Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request · 21-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Group-IB

Group-IB Attack Surface Management leads on 0 checks, Check Point External Risk Management on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGroup-IB Attack Surface Management · 8.8/10
  • Free trialonly Group-IB Attack Surface Management
  • Most featuresGroup-IB Attack Surface Management · 4 of 4

Group-IB Attack Surface Management scores higher on our rubric for attack surface management software: 8.8 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

Group-IB Attack Surface Management is the better fit for teams needing threat-intelligence-enriched ASM. Check Point External Risk Management is the better fit for organizations combining ASM with brand protection.

  • Group-IB Attack Surface Management fits best

    Teams needing threat-intelligence-enriched ASM

  • Check Point External Risk Management fits best

    Organizations combining ASM with brand protection

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Group-IB Attack Surface Management 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Check Point External Risk Management 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.6
Ranking #5 in Attack Surface Management Software #7 in Attack Surface Management Software
Best for Teams needing threat-intelligence-enriched ASM Organizations combining ASM with brand protection
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial 21 days —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Integrations 2 integrations 70+ integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Group-IB Attack Surface Management 4/4 · Check Point External Risk Management 3/4
External asset discovery ✓ ✓
Attack-path analysis ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Cloud asset discovery ✓ ✓
API access ✓ ✓
Specs
Asset limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Monitoring frequency Continuous Continuous
Our review
Pros
  • Continuously discovers and monitors external, shadow-IT, and forgotten assets
  • Enriches risk findings with threat intelligence and relationship mapping
  • Supports remediation workflows, reporting, notifications, and REST API access
  • Discovers internet-facing assets, cloud resources, vulnerabilities, and misconfigurations
  • Combines risk scoring, threat intelligence, and continuous monitoring
  • Adds dark web monitoring plus brand and impersonation protection
Cons
  • No free plan is available
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Listed integrations are limited to AWS and Microsoft Azure
  • Pricing requires a sales conversation
  • Scan cadence may vary by service package
  • Managed services may not suit teams seeking a self-serve tool
Our verdict

Group-IB Attack Surface Management is an external attack surface management platform for organizations that need visibility into internet-facing infrastructure. It discovers and inventories known, unknown, shadow IT, and forgotten assets,…

Read the review →

Check Point External Risk Management is a cybersecurity solution and managed service for organizations that need visibility into internet-facing assets and external threats. It is aimed at security leaders, CISOs, SOC managers,…

Read the review →
  1. Group-IB Attack Surface ManagementAttack Surface Management Software 8.8Pricing on request · 21-day trial
  2. Check Point External Risk ManagementAttack Surface Management Software 8.6Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Group-IB Attack Surface Management — where it wins

    • Continuously discovers and monitors external, shadow-IT, and forgotten assets
    • Enriches risk findings with threat intelligence and relationship mapping
    • Supports remediation workflows, reporting, notifications, and REST API access

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan is available
    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Listed integrations are limited to AWS and Microsoft Azure
  • Check Point External Risk Management — where it wins

    • Discovers internet-facing assets, cloud resources, vulnerabilities, and misconfigurations
    • Combines risk scoring, threat intelligence, and continuous monitoring
    • Adds dark web monitoring plus brand and impersonation protection

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a sales conversation
    • Scan cadence may vary by service package
    • Managed services may not suit teams seeking a self-serve tool
  • Group-IB Attack Surface Management8.8/10 · Pricing on request · 21-day trial

    A threat-intelligence-enriched ASM platform with continuous monitoring and remediation workflows.

    Visit Group-IBFull verdict →
  • Check Point External Risk Management8.6/10 · Pricing on request

    External risk management that combines attack surface visibility with brand protection.

    Visit Check PointFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update