Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Attack Surface Management Software

Tenable One Attack Surface Management vs Group-IB Attack Surface Management

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Tenable One Attack Surface Management #2 in Attack Surface Management Software 9.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Tenable
Group-IB Attack Surface Management #5 in Attack Surface Management Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request · 21-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Group-IB

Tenable One Attack Surface Management leads on 0 checks, Group-IB Attack Surface Management on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreTenable One Attack Surface Management · 9.1/10
  • Free trialonly Group-IB Attack Surface Management

Tenable One Attack Surface Management scores higher on our rubric for attack surface management software: 9.1 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #5.

Tenable One Attack Surface Management is the better fit for tenable users needing external asset visibility. Group-IB Attack Surface Management is the better fit for teams needing threat-intelligence-enriched ASM.

  • Tenable One Attack Surface Management fits best

    Tenable users needing external asset visibility

  • Group-IB Attack Surface Management fits best

    Teams needing threat-intelligence-enriched ASM

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Tenable One Attack Surface Management 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Group-IB Attack Surface Management 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 8.8
Ranking #2 in Attack Surface Management Software #5 in Attack Surface Management Software
Best for Tenable users needing external asset visibility Teams needing threat-intelligence-enriched ASM
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — —
Free plan — —
Free trial — 21 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Integrations 6 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Tenable One Attack Surface Management 4/4 · Group-IB Attack Surface Management 4/4
External asset discovery ✓ ✓
Attack-path analysis ✓ ✓
Cloud asset discovery ✓ ✓
API access ✓ ✓
Specs
Asset limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Monitoring frequency Continuous Continuous
Our review
Pros
  • Discovers known and unknown internet-facing assets continuously
  • Enriches inventory with more than 180 metadata fields
  • Connects cloud sources and Tenable scanning products
  • Continuously discovers and monitors external, shadow-IT, and forgotten assets
  • Enriches risk findings with threat intelligence and relationship mapping
  • Supports remediation workflows, reporting, notifications, and REST API access
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales for a quote
  • Attack path analysis is available in the Advanced plan
  • Focused on external attack surface visibility rather than a narrow asset type
  • No free plan is available
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Listed integrations are limited to AWS and Microsoft Azure
Our verdict

Tenable One Attack Surface Management is a cloud-based solution for organizations that need visibility into internet-facing assets and services. It discovers known and unknown assets through domains, DNS records, IP addresses, and…

Read the review →

Group-IB Attack Surface Management is an external attack surface management platform for organizations that need visibility into internet-facing infrastructure. It discovers and inventories known, unknown, shadow IT, and forgotten assets,…

Read the review →
  1. Tenable One Attack Surface ManagementAttack Surface Management Software 9.1Pricing on request
  2. Group-IB Attack Surface ManagementAttack Surface Management Software 8.8Pricing on request · 21-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Tenable One Attack Surface Management — where it wins

    • Discovers known and unknown internet-facing assets continuously
    • Enriches inventory with more than 180 metadata fields
    • Connects cloud sources and Tenable scanning products

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales for a quote
    • Attack path analysis is available in the Advanced plan
    • Focused on external attack surface visibility rather than a narrow asset type
  • Group-IB Attack Surface Management — where it wins

    • Continuously discovers and monitors external, shadow-IT, and forgotten assets
    • Enriches risk findings with threat intelligence and relationship mapping
    • Supports remediation workflows, reporting, notifications, and REST API access

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan is available
    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Listed integrations are limited to AWS and Microsoft Azure
  • Tenable One Attack Surface Management9.1/10 · Pricing on request

    A strong fit for Tenable users seeking continuous visibility into external assets.

    Visit TenableFull verdict →
  • Group-IB Attack Surface Management8.8/10 · Pricing on request · 21-day trial

    A threat-intelligence-enriched ASM platform with continuous monitoring and remediation workflows.

    Visit Group-IBFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update