Head-to-head · Cloud File Storage Services
Google Cloud NetApp Volumes vs Amazon FSx for Windows File Server
Google Cloud NetApp Volumes leads on 0 checks, Amazon FSx for Windows File Server on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreGoogle Cloud NetApp Volumes · 9.0/10
Google Cloud NetApp Volumes scores higher on our rubric for cloud file storage services: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.
Google Cloud NetApp Volumes is the better fit for google Cloud multiprotocol volumes. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is the better fit for low-cost Windows-compatible file shares.
- Google Cloud NetApp Volumes fits best
Google Cloud multiprotocol volumes
- Amazon FSx for Windows File Server fits best
Low-cost Windows-compatible file shares
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Google Cloud NetApp Volumes 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | Amazon FSx for Windows File Server 8.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Ranking | #5 in Cloud File Storage Services | #7 in Cloud File Storage Services |
| Best for | Google Cloud multiprotocol volumes | Low-cost Windows-compatible file shares |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | — | $0.01/GB/mo |
| Free plan | Not checked yet | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Docs | Docs, Community |
| Integrations | 3 integrations | 8 integrations |
| Built for | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Google Cloud NetApp Volumes 2/2 · Amazon FSx for Windows File Server 2/2 | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | ✓ |
| Managed backups | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Supported protocols | NFSv3, NFSv4.1, NFSv4.2, SMB, iSCSI, NVMe/TCP, S3 multiprotocol (ONTAP-mode only) | SMB |
| Maximum capacity | Not checked yet | 64 TB |
| Availability zones | Not checked yet | 1 zones |
| Scaling model | Provisioned | Provisioned |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Google Cloud NetApp Volumes is a fully managed cloud storage service for file- and block-based applications running on Google Cloud. It is designed for organizations moving enterprise workloads, databases, file shares, and application data… Read the review → |
Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is a fully managed cloud file system for shared Windows-compatible storage in AWS. It serves Windows applications, Linux and macOS clients, and AWS services over SMB. Its fit is strongest for business… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Google Cloud NetApp Volumes — where it wins
- Supports NFS, SMB, iSCSI, and NVMe/TCP
- Offers snapshots, backups, replication, cloning, and auto-tiering
- Provides zonal and regional availability with Active Directory integration
Where it doesn't
- Pricing varies by region and may add throughput, IOPS, replication, and transfer charges
- Flex File pools cannot be newly created after September 15, 2026
- Provisioned capacity and performance require storage planning
Amazon FSx for Windows File Server — where it wins
- SMB access with Microsoft Active Directory integration
- Daily and on-demand backups plus Windows shadow copies
- AWS integrations including Backup, CloudWatch, and CloudFormation
Where it doesn't
- Core protocol coverage is limited to SMB
- The entry plan uses Single-AZ HDD storage
- Pricing varies with region, deployment, capacity, and data transfer
- Google Cloud NetApp Volumes9.0/10 · Paid
A flexible Google Cloud service for enterprise file, block, and application storage.
Visit Google CloudFull verdict → - Amazon FSx for Windows File Server8.8/10 · Paid
A low-cost AWS file share for Windows workloads that need SMB and Active Directory.
Visit Amazon FSxFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP vs Google Cloud NetApp Volumes
- Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP vs Amazon FSx for Windows File Server
- Alibaba Cloud File Storage NAS vs Google Cloud NetApp Volumes
- Alibaba Cloud File Storage NAS vs Amazon FSx for Windows File Server
- NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Google Cloud NetApp Volumes
- NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Amazon FSx for Windows File Server
- Azure NetApp Files vs Google Cloud NetApp Volumes
- Azure NetApp Files vs Amazon FSx for Windows File Server
All cloud file storage services comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





