Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Cloud File Storage Services

Azure NetApp Files vs Amazon FSx for Windows File Server

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side

Azure NetApp Files leads on 0 checks, Amazon FSx for Windows File Server on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAzure NetApp Files · 9.1/10

Azure NetApp Files scores higher on our rubric for cloud file storage services: 9.1 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.

Azure NetApp Files is the better fit for azure enterprise file volumes. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is the better fit for low-cost Windows-compatible file shares.

  • Azure NetApp Files fits best

    Azure enterprise file volumes

  • Amazon FSx for Windows File Server fits best

    Low-cost Windows-compatible file shares

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Azure NetApp Files 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Amazon FSx for Windows File Server 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 8.8
Ranking #4 in Cloud File Storage Services #7 in Cloud File Storage Services
Best for Azure enterprise file volumes Low-cost Windows-compatible file shares
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — $0.01/GB/mo
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Tickets, Community, Docs Docs, Community
Integrations 6 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Azure NetApp Files 2/2 · Amazon FSx for Windows File Server 2/2
Snapshots ✓ ✓
Managed backups ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported protocols NFS, SMB, dual protocol, Object REST API SMB
Maximum capacity Not checked yet 64 TB
Availability zones Not checked yet 1 zones
Scaling model Provisioned Provisioned
Our review
Pros
  • Supports NFS, SMB, and dual-protocol file volumes
  • Offers snapshots, cloning, backups, replication, and tiering
  • Connects with Azure analytics, AI, Kubernetes, and VMware services
  • SMB access with Microsoft Active Directory integration
  • Daily and on-demand backups plus Windows shadow copies
  • AWS integrations including Backup, CloudWatch, and CloudFormation
Cons
  • Provisioned capacity and throughput require configuration planning
  • The service has no free plan
  • Elastic Storage is listed as a preview service
  • Core protocol coverage is limited to SMB
  • The entry plan uses Single-AZ HDD storage
  • Pricing varies with region, deployment, capacity, and data transfer
Our verdict

Azure NetApp Files is a managed cloud file storage service for Azure workloads that need shared, high-performance file access. It supports NFS, SMB, dual-protocol volumes, and an Object REST API, making it suitable for enterprise file…

Read the review →

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is a fully managed cloud file system for shared Windows-compatible storage in AWS. It serves Windows applications, Linux and macOS clients, and AWS services over SMB. Its fit is strongest for business…

Read the review →
  1. Azure NetApp FilesCloud File Storage Services 9.1Paid
  2. Amazon FSx for Windows File ServerCloud File Storage Services 8.8Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Azure NetApp Files — where it wins

    • Supports NFS, SMB, and dual-protocol file volumes
    • Offers snapshots, cloning, backups, replication, and tiering
    • Connects with Azure analytics, AI, Kubernetes, and VMware services

    Where it doesn't

    • Provisioned capacity and throughput require configuration planning
    • The service has no free plan
    • Elastic Storage is listed as a preview service
  • Amazon FSx for Windows File Server — where it wins

    • SMB access with Microsoft Active Directory integration
    • Daily and on-demand backups plus Windows shadow copies
    • AWS integrations including Backup, CloudWatch, and CloudFormation

    Where it doesn't

    • Core protocol coverage is limited to SMB
    • The entry plan uses Single-AZ HDD storage
    • Pricing varies with region, deployment, capacity, and data transfer
  • Azure NetApp Files9.1/10 · Paid

    A configurable Azure file service for enterprise workloads needing shared file access.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • Amazon FSx for Windows File Server8.8/10 · Paid

    A low-cost AWS file share for Windows workloads that need SMB and Active Directory.

    Visit Amazon FSxFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update