Head-to-head · Text Editors
GNU Emacs vs UltraEdit
GNU Emacs leads on 1 check, UltraEdit on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreGNU Emacs · 9.2/10
- Free planonly GNU Emacs
- Free trialonly UltraEdit
GNU Emacs scores higher on our rubric for text editors: 9.2 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #11.
GNU Emacs offers free plan; UltraEdit doesn't.
GNU Emacs is the better fit for mature customization-focused editor users. UltraEdit is the better fit for professionals handling very large files.
- GNU Emacs fits best
Mature customization-focused editor users
- UltraEdit fits best
Professionals handling very large files
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | GNU Emacs 9.2/10 Visit ↗ | UltraEdit 8.4/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.2 | 8.4 |
| Ranking | #3 in Text Editors | #11 in Text Editors |
| Best for | Mature customization-focused editor users | Professionals handling very large files |
| Pricing model | Free | Paid |
| Starting price | Free plan | $94.96/user/yr |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | — | 7 days |
| Deployment | Desktop, Mobile | Desktop |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Email, Community, Docs | Community, Docs · 24/7 |
| Built for | Solo, Small business | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features GNU Emacs 5/5 · UltraEdit 5/5 | ||
| Multi-cursor editing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Macro recording | ✓ | ✓ |
| Column editing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Large-file handling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Extension support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Supported platforms | GNU/Linux, Windows, macOS, Android, BSD, Haiku, Solaris, MS-DOS/FreeDOS | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | GNU Emacs is a free/libre, open-source text editor and computing environment for users who want extensive control over editing behavior. It provides content-aware editing modes, syntax coloring for many file types, Unicode support for… Read the review → |
UltraEdit is a commercial text, code, and hex editor for developers, data professionals, IT teams, system administrators, and power users. Its focus is broad but technically deep: large-file editing, multi-caret and column-based editing,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
GNU Emacs — where it wins
- Free/libre and open source with no paid plans
- Macros, column editing, Unicode, and large-file handling
- Projects, version control, debugging, mail, calendars, and IRC
Where it doesn't
- Multi-cursor editing is not verified as a built-in feature
- Its broad feature set extends well beyond text editing
- Advanced customization depends on Emacs Lisp or graphical settings
UltraEdit — where it wins
- Handles large files with disk-based file processing
- Combines macros, JavaScript scripting, and advanced search
- Supports Windows, macOS, and Linux with FTP and SSH connectivity
Where it doesn't
- No free plan is available
- Starting price is $94.96 per year with annual billing
- Advanced features may exceed the needs of basic text editing
- GNU Emacs9.2/10 · Free plan
A mature, highly customizable editor for users who value breadth and control.
Visit GNU EmacsFull verdict → - UltraEdit8.4/10 · 7-day trial
A deep, large-file editor for professionals who need automation and remote connectivity.
Visit UltraEditFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Visual Studio Code vs GNU Emacs
- Neovim vs GNU Emacs
- GNU Emacs vs Notepad++
- GNU Emacs vs Kate
- GNU Emacs vs Vim
- GNU Emacs vs Zed
- GNU Emacs vs BBEdit
All text editors comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






