Git vs Mercurial

Git9.4Visit Mercurial7.8Visit

Higher score Git #1 in Version Control Software 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Git

vs

Mercurial #12 in Version Control Software 7.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Mercurial

• Git fits best

  General-purpose distributed version control

• Mercurial fits best

  Free distributed offline workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Git 9.4/10 Visit ↗	Mercurial 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.4	7.8
Ranking	#1 in Version Control Software	#12 in Version Control Software
Best for	General-purpose distributed version control	Free distributed offline workflows
Pricing model	Free	Free
Starting price	Free plan	Free plan
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Desktop, Self-hosted	Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms	Windows, macOS, Linux	Windows, macOS, Linux
Support	Community, Docs	Community, Docs
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Git 3/4 · Mercurial 3/4
Self-hosted deployment	✓	✓
File locking	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Sparse checkout	✓	✓
Nested repositories	✓	✓
Specs
Versioning model	Distributed	Distributed
Desktop platforms	Windows, macOS, Linux	Windows, macOS, Linux
Large-file handling	Extension	Extension
Our review
Pros	Branching, merging, rebasing, cherry-picking, and selective staging Distributed repositories with local history and remote synchronization Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with sparse checkout and submodules	Complete local history supports offline commits and history inspection Extensions add large-file handling, sparse checkout, and commands Supports Windows, GNU/Linux, macOS, and nested repositories
Cons	Primarily a command-line tool rather than a single visual application File locking is not part of core Git Large-file handling requires the separate Git LFS extension	Sparse checkout is documented as an experimental extension Large-file handling depends on the largefiles extension Web publishing requires the hgweb interface
Our verdict	Git is a free, open-source distributed version control system for developers and teams managing projects from small codebases to very large repositories. It records file changes in local repositories, preserves project history, and… Read the review →	Mercurial is a free, open-source distributed version control system for developers and teams managing versioned files and software projects. Its distributed repository architecture gives each clone a complete project history, so users can… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Git — where it wins

  • Branching, merging, rebasing, cherry-picking, and selective staging
  • Distributed repositories with local history and remote synchronization
  • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with sparse checkout and submodules

  Where it doesn't

  • Primarily a command-line tool rather than a single visual application
  • File locking is not part of core Git
  • Large-file handling requires the separate Git LFS extension

• Mercurial — where it wins

  • Complete local history supports offline commits and history inspection
  • Extensions add large-file handling, sparse checkout, and commands
  • Supports Windows, GNU/Linux, macOS, and nested repositories

  Where it doesn't

  • Sparse checkout is documented as an experimental extension
  • Large-file handling depends on the largefiles extension
  • Web publishing requires the hgweb interface

• Git9.4/10 · Free plan

  A broad, free distributed workflow for developers who need precise history control.

  Visit GitFull verdict →
• Mercurial7.8/10 · Free plan

  A free, open-source choice for local history, offline commits, and distributed collaboration.

  Visit MercurialFull verdict →