This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them

Period

–Visits

–Page views

–Clicks to vendors

–Time on page

–Reading now

Clicks to vendors, by tool

Top countries

Devices

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · PACS Software

GE HealthCare Centricity PACS vs Konica Minolta Exa PACS

Updated Oct 2026
Both researched from official sources
4 checks side by side

Higher score GE HealthCare Centricity PACS #6 in PACS Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit GE HealthCare

Konica Minolta Exa PACS #7 in PACS Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Konica Minolta

GE HealthCare Centricity PACS leads on 0 checks, Konica Minolta Exa PACS on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

Highest scoreGE HealthCare Centricity PACS · 8.8/10
Most featuresKonica Minolta Exa PACS · 4 of 4

GE HealthCare Centricity PACS scores higher on our rubric for pacs software: 8.8 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #7.

On deployment, GE HealthCare Centricity PACS gives you On-premises where Konica Minolta Exa PACS offers Cloud.

GE HealthCare Centricity PACS is the better fit for hospitals needing broad modality coverage. Konica Minolta Exa PACS is the better fit for radiology groups seeking web-based imaging workflows.

GE HealthCare Centricity PACS fits best
Hospitals needing broad modality coverage
Konica Minolta Exa PACS fits best
Radiology groups seeking web-based imaging workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Show only differences

Feature	GE HealthCare Centricity PACS 8.8/10 Visit ↗	Konica Minolta Exa PACS 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.8	8.7
Ranking	#6 in PACS Software	#7 in PACS Software
Best for	Hospitals needing broad modality coverage	Radiology groups seeking web-based imaging workflows
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	Pricing on request	Pricing on request
Free plan	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Self-hosted	Cloud
Platforms	Web	Web, iOS, Android
Built for	Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features GE HealthCare Centricity PACS 3/4 · Konica Minolta Exa PACS 4/4
Diagnostic viewer	✓	✓
DICOM support	✓	✓
Web viewer	✓	✓
Mobile viewing	Not checked yet	✓ (best)
Specs
Deployment	On-premises	Cloud
Supported modalities	CT, MR, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, computerized radiography, digital mammography, digital X-ray, PET, X-ray angiography, intra-oral X-ray, radiofluoroscopic X-ray, secondary capture, visible light	PET, DBT, surgical video
Our review
Pros	Supports a wide range of imaging modalities Diagnostic viewer includes customizable worklists and case assignment Integrates third-party AI results into reading workflows	Zero-footprint diagnostic viewer uses server-side rendering. Specialty viewing includes PET, DBT, and surgical video. Worklists, STAT prioritization, reporting, peer review, and messaging are included.
Cons	Requires on-premises, self-hosted deployment Capabilities vary by system version and configuration Pricing follows a contact-sales model	Pricing requires contacting sales. Email is the listed support channel. AWS is the only named integration.
Our verdict	GE HealthCare Centricity PACS is a picture archiving and communication system for healthcare providers handling diagnostic imaging. It receives, transfers, stores, processes and displays medical images through a web-based Universal Viewer.… Read the review →	Konica Minolta Exa PACS is a picture archiving and communication system for radiology and imaging organizations. Its web-based diagnostic viewer uses server-side rendering, giving users access from web-enabled computers and mobile devices… Read the review →

G GE HealthCare Centricity PACSPACS Software 8.8Pricing on request
Konica Minolta Exa PACSPACS Software 8.7Pricing on request

Compare the top tools in

Strengths and trade-offs

GE HealthCare Centricity PACS — where it wins
- Supports a wide range of imaging modalities
- Diagnostic viewer includes customizable worklists and case assignment
- Integrates third-party AI results into reading workflows
Where it doesn't
- Requires on-premises, self-hosted deployment
- Capabilities vary by system version and configuration
- Pricing follows a contact-sales model
Konica Minolta Exa PACS — where it wins
- Zero-footprint diagnostic viewer uses server-side rendering.
- Specialty viewing includes PET, DBT, and surgical video.
- Worklists, STAT prioritization, reporting, peer review, and messaging are included.
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires contacting sales.
- Email is the listed support channel.
- AWS is the only named integration.

GE HealthCare Centricity PACS8.8/10 · Pricing on request
Broad, web-based PACS coverage for hospitals managing diverse imaging workflows.
Visit GE HealthCare Full verdict →
Konica Minolta Exa PACS8.7/10 · Pricing on request
A web-based PACS combining diagnostic viewing with radiology workflow tools.
Visit Konica Minolta Full verdict →

More comparisons

All PACS software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated 7 Oct 2026 · How we research and update