Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · PACS Software

Fujifilm Synapse PACS vs GE HealthCare Centricity PACS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Fujifilm Synapse PACS #2 in PACS Software 9.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Contact Fujifilm
GE HealthCare Centricity PACS #6 in PACS Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit GE HealthCare

Fujifilm Synapse PACS leads on 0 checks, GE HealthCare Centricity PACS on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFujifilm Synapse PACS · 9.2/10
  • Most featuresFujifilm Synapse PACS · 4 of 4

Fujifilm Synapse PACS scores higher on our rubric for pacs software: 9.2 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.

On deployment, Fujifilm Synapse PACS gives you Hybrid where GE HealthCare Centricity PACS offers On-premises.

Fujifilm Synapse PACS is the better fit for health systems coordinating imaging across departments. GE HealthCare Centricity PACS is the better fit for hospitals needing broad modality coverage.

  • Fujifilm Synapse PACS fits best

    Health systems coordinating imaging across departments

  • GE HealthCare Centricity PACS fits best

    Hospitals needing broad modality coverage

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Fujifilm Synapse PACS 9.2/10 Visit ↗ GE HealthCare Centricity PACS 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.8
Ranking #2 in PACS Software #6 in PACS Software
Best for Health systems coordinating imaging across departments Hospitals needing broad modality coverage
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Fujifilm Synapse PACS 4/4 · GE HealthCare Centricity PACS 3/4
Diagnostic viewer ✓ ✓
DICOM support ✓ ✓
Web viewer ✓ ✓
Mobile viewing ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Hybrid On-premises
Supported modalities Radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology, specialty-department imaging CT, MR, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, computerized radiography, digital mammography, digital X-ray, PET, X-ray angiography, intra-oral X-ray, radiofluoroscopic X-ray, secondary capture, visible light
Our review
Pros
  • Combines radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology and specialty imaging
  • Supports DICOM and non-DICOM access, with zero-download viewing
  • Adds AI worklist assignment and study prioritization to PACS workflows
  • Supports a wide range of imaging modalities
  • Diagnostic viewer includes customizable worklists and case assignment
  • Integrates third-party AI results into reading workflows
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Enterprise scope may exceed the needs of a single imaging department
  • Web platform is specified, with no desktop platform listed
  • Requires on-premises, self-hosted deployment
  • Capabilities vary by system version and configuration
  • Pricing follows a contact-sales model
Our verdict

Fujifilm Synapse PACS is an enterprise picture archiving and communication system for healthcare organizations that need a shared diagnostic viewer across imaging specialties. It brings radiology and mammography together with cardiology,…

Read the review →

GE HealthCare Centricity PACS is a picture archiving and communication system for healthcare providers handling diagnostic imaging. It receives, transfers, stores, processes and displays medical images through a web-based Universal Viewer.…

Read the review →
  1. Fujifilm Synapse PACSPACS Software 9.2Pricing on request
  2. GE HealthCare Centricity PACSPACS Software 8.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Fujifilm Synapse PACS — where it wins

    • Combines radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology and specialty imaging
    • Supports DICOM and non-DICOM access, with zero-download viewing
    • Adds AI worklist assignment and study prioritization to PACS workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Enterprise scope may exceed the needs of a single imaging department
    • Web platform is specified, with no desktop platform listed
  • GE HealthCare Centricity PACS — where it wins

    • Supports a wide range of imaging modalities
    • Diagnostic viewer includes customizable worklists and case assignment
    • Integrates third-party AI results into reading workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires on-premises, self-hosted deployment
    • Capabilities vary by system version and configuration
    • Pricing follows a contact-sales model
  • Fujifilm Synapse PACS9.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad diagnostic viewer for health systems bringing multiple imaging specialties together.

    Contact FujifilmFull verdict →
  • GE HealthCare Centricity PACS8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad, web-based PACS coverage for hospitals managing diverse imaging workflows.

    Visit GE HealthCareFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update