Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · PACS Software

Fujifilm Synapse PACS vs Sectra PACS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Fujifilm Synapse PACS #2 in PACS Software 9.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Contact Fujifilm
Sectra PACS #3 in PACS Software 9.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Sectra

Fujifilm Synapse PACS leads on 0 checks, Sectra PACS on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFujifilm Synapse PACS · 9.2/10

Fujifilm Synapse PACS scores higher on our rubric for pacs software: 9.2 against 9.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.

Fujifilm Synapse PACS is the better fit for health systems coordinating imaging across departments. Sectra PACS is the better fit for compliant radiology teams needing 3D web access.

  • Fujifilm Synapse PACS fits best

    Health systems coordinating imaging across departments

  • Sectra PACS fits best

    Compliant radiology teams needing 3D web access

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Fujifilm Synapse PACS 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Sectra PACS 9.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 9.1
Ranking #2 in PACS Software #3 in PACS Software
Best for Health systems coordinating imaging across departments Compliant radiology teams needing 3D web access
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web, Windows
Support Docs Docs
Compliance HIPAA GDPR, HIPAA
Integrations 5 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Fujifilm Synapse PACS 4/4 · Sectra PACS 4/4
Diagnostic viewer ✓ ✓
DICOM support ✓ ✓
Web viewer ✓ ✓
Mobile viewing ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment Hybrid Hybrid
Supported modalities Radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology, specialty-department imaging CT, MRI, ultrasound; vendor-neutral modality interfaces
Our review
Pros
  • Combines radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology and specialty imaging
  • Supports DICOM and non-DICOM access, with zero-download viewing
  • Adds AI worklist assignment and study prioritization to PACS workflows
  • 2D, 3D, and MPR diagnostic viewing with measurements and annotations.
  • Vendor-neutral CT, MRI, and ultrasound interfaces with DICOM conformance.
  • Web access plus RIS/EMR integration for distributed care teams.
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Enterprise scope may exceed the needs of a single imaging department
  • Web platform is specified, with no desktop platform listed
  • Pricing requires a contact-sales process; no free plan is offered.
  • Support is documented through docs, which may not fit teams needing direct assistance.
  • Designed for health systems and imaging organizations, not individual consumers.
Our verdict

Fujifilm Synapse PACS is an enterprise picture archiving and communication system for healthcare organizations that need a shared diagnostic viewer across imaging specialties. It brings radiology and mammography together with cardiology,…

Read the review →

Sectra PACS manages, stores, and reviews medical images for radiology teams across healthcare organizations. It supports diagnostic workflows for imaging modalities including CT, MRI, and ultrasound, while giving clinicians and care teams…

Read the review →
  1. Fujifilm Synapse PACSPACS Software 9.2Pricing on request
  2. Sectra PACSPACS Software 9.1Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Fujifilm Synapse PACS — where it wins

    • Combines radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology and specialty imaging
    • Supports DICOM and non-DICOM access, with zero-download viewing
    • Adds AI worklist assignment and study prioritization to PACS workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Enterprise scope may exceed the needs of a single imaging department
    • Web platform is specified, with no desktop platform listed

  • Sectra PACS — where it wins

    • 2D, 3D, and MPR diagnostic viewing with measurements and annotations.
    • Vendor-neutral CT, MRI, and ultrasound interfaces with DICOM conformance.
    • Web access plus RIS/EMR integration for distributed care teams.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a contact-sales process; no free plan is offered.
    • Support is documented through docs, which may not fit teams needing direct assistance.
    • Designed for health systems and imaging organizations, not individual consumers.
  • Fujifilm Synapse PACS9.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad diagnostic viewer for health systems bringing multiple imaging specialties together.

    Contact FujifilmFull verdict →
  • Sectra PACS9.1/10 · Pricing on request

    Compliant PACS with 2D/3D/MPR review, web access, and RIS/EMR integration.

    Visit SectraFull verdict →

More comparisons

All PACS software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update