Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · PACS Software

Fujifilm Synapse PACS vs Konica Minolta Exa PACS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Fujifilm Synapse PACS #2 in PACS Software 9.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Contact Fujifilm
Konica Minolta Exa PACS #7 in PACS Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Konica Minolta

Fujifilm Synapse PACS leads on 0 checks, Konica Minolta Exa PACS on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFujifilm Synapse PACS · 9.2/10

Fujifilm Synapse PACS scores higher on our rubric for pacs software: 9.2 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #7.

On deployment, Fujifilm Synapse PACS gives you Hybrid where Konica Minolta Exa PACS offers Cloud.

Fujifilm Synapse PACS is the better fit for health systems coordinating imaging across departments. Konica Minolta Exa PACS is the better fit for radiology groups seeking web-based imaging workflows.

  • Fujifilm Synapse PACS fits best

    Health systems coordinating imaging across departments

  • Konica Minolta Exa PACS fits best

    Radiology groups seeking web-based imaging workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Fujifilm Synapse PACS 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Konica Minolta Exa PACS 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.7
Ranking #2 in PACS Software #7 in PACS Software
Best for Health systems coordinating imaging across departments Radiology groups seeking web-based imaging workflows
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android
Support Docs Email
Integrations 5 integrations 1 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Fujifilm Synapse PACS 4/4 · Konica Minolta Exa PACS 4/4
Diagnostic viewer ✓ ✓
DICOM support ✓ ✓
Web viewer ✓ ✓
Mobile viewing ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment Hybrid Cloud
Supported modalities Radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology, specialty-department imaging PET, DBT, surgical video
Our review
Pros
  • Combines radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology and specialty imaging
  • Supports DICOM and non-DICOM access, with zero-download viewing
  • Adds AI worklist assignment and study prioritization to PACS workflows
  • Zero-footprint diagnostic viewer uses server-side rendering.
  • Specialty viewing includes PET, DBT, and surgical video.
  • Worklists, STAT prioritization, reporting, peer review, and messaging are included.
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Enterprise scope may exceed the needs of a single imaging department
  • Web platform is specified, with no desktop platform listed
  • Pricing requires contacting sales.
  • Email is the listed support channel.
  • AWS is the only named integration.
Our verdict

Fujifilm Synapse PACS is an enterprise picture archiving and communication system for healthcare organizations that need a shared diagnostic viewer across imaging specialties. It brings radiology and mammography together with cardiology,…

Read the review →

Konica Minolta Exa PACS is a picture archiving and communication system for radiology and imaging organizations. Its web-based diagnostic viewer uses server-side rendering, giving users access from web-enabled computers and mobile devices…

Read the review →
  1. Fujifilm Synapse PACSPACS Software 9.2Pricing on request
  2. Konica Minolta Exa PACSPACS Software 8.7Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Fujifilm Synapse PACS — where it wins

    • Combines radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology and specialty imaging
    • Supports DICOM and non-DICOM access, with zero-download viewing
    • Adds AI worklist assignment and study prioritization to PACS workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Enterprise scope may exceed the needs of a single imaging department
    • Web platform is specified, with no desktop platform listed

  • Konica Minolta Exa PACS — where it wins

    • Zero-footprint diagnostic viewer uses server-side rendering.
    • Specialty viewing includes PET, DBT, and surgical video.
    • Worklists, STAT prioritization, reporting, peer review, and messaging are included.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales.
    • Email is the listed support channel.
    • AWS is the only named integration.
  • Fujifilm Synapse PACS9.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad diagnostic viewer for health systems bringing multiple imaging specialties together.

    Contact FujifilmFull verdict →
  • Konica Minolta Exa PACS8.7/10 · Pricing on request

    A web-based PACS combining diagnostic viewing with radiology workflow tools.

    Visit Konica MinoltaFull verdict →

More comparisons

All PACS software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update