Head-to-head · Decentralized Storage Services
Filebase vs Storj
Filebase leads on 2 checks, Storj on 1, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreFilebase · 8.9/10
- Lowest starting priceStorj · $7/mo
- Free planonly Filebase
- Most featuresFilebase · 1 of 4
Filebase scores higher on our rubric for decentralized storage services: 8.9 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.
Filebase offers free plan; Storj doesn't. Storj is cheaper to start at $7/mo against $7.5/mo. Filebase offers ipfs support; Storj doesn't publish it.
Filebase is the better fit for developers needing affordable IPFS and S3 storage. Storj is the better fit for S3-compatible production object storage.
- Filebase fits best
Developers needing affordable IPFS and S3 storage
- Storj fits best
S3-compatible production object storage
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Filebase 8.9/10 Visit ↗ | Storj 8.7/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Ranking | #3 in Decentralized Storage Services | #4 in Decentralized Storage Services |
| Best for | Developers needing affordable IPFS and S3 storage | S3-compatible production object storage |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $7.5/mo | $7/mo (best) |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Integrations | 15 integrations | 4 integrations |
| Features Filebase 1/4 · Storj 0/4 | ||
| Client-side encryption | — | Not published |
| IPFS support | ✓ (best) | Not published |
| Desktop apps | Not published | Not published |
| Mobile apps | Not published | Not published |
| Specs | ||
| Free storage | 5 GB | Not published |
| Network type | Hybrid | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Filebase combines S3-compatible object storage with IPFS pinning for developers, decentralized applications, and production workloads. It supports bucket creation, object uploads through APIs or S3-compatible tools, IPFS content pinning,… Read the review → |
Storj provides distributed cloud object storage for organizations managing backups, media, AI data, and other large files. Its hosted service offers an S3-compatible REST API and gateway, while Gateway ST supports a self-hosted option.… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Filebase — where it wins
- Free 5 GB plan with free object egress
- S3-compatible APIs, tools, SDKs, and CLI access
- IPFS pinning, gateways, CDN delivery, and CID management
Where it doesn't
- Client-side encryption is not built in
- Free plan limits storage, buckets, and pinned files
- Enterprise pricing is volume-based rather than fixed
Storj — where it wins
- S3-compatible API and gateway support broadens tooling options.
- Erasure-coded global distribution supports large-file storage workloads.
- Versioning, Object Lock, and TTL expiration add retention controls.
Where it doesn't
- Standard storage is globally distributed rather than region-specific.
- Lifecycle configuration uses Storj-specific TTL controls.
- Advanced storage costs more than the Standard tier.
- Filebase8.9/10 · Free plan · paid from $7.50/mo
Affordable hybrid storage with IPFS, S3 compatibility, gateways, and CDN delivery.
Visit FilebaseFull verdict → - Storj8.7/10 · From $7/mo · 30-day trial
A mature S3-compatible storage service for distributed production workloads.
Visit StorjFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Sia vs Filebase
- Sia vs Storj
- Peergos vs Filebase
- Peergos vs Storj
- Filebase vs 4EVERLAND
- Filebase vs Filecoin
- Filebase vs Pinata
- Filebase vs Stratos
All decentralized storage services comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update







