Head-to-head · NVMe VPS Hosting
Fasthosts VPS vs Bluehost VPS
Fasthosts VPS leads on 1 check, Bluehost VPS on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreFasthosts VPS · 8.8/10
Fasthosts VPS scores higher on our rubric for nvme vps hosting: 8.8 against 6.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #7.
Fasthosts VPS leads on vcpu: 4 versus 2.
Fasthosts VPS is the better fit for established NVMe VPS with broad OS support. Bluehost VPS is the better fit for established managed VPS for websites.
- Fasthosts VPS fits best
Established NVMe VPS with broad OS support
- Bluehost VPS fits best
Established managed VPS for websites
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Fasthosts VPS 8.8/10 Visit ↗ | Bluehost VPS 6.7/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.8 | 6.7 |
| Ranking | #1 in NVMe VPS Hosting | #7 in NVMe VPS Hosting |
| Best for | Established NVMe VPS with broad OS support | Established managed VPS for websites |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, Linux | Web, Linux |
| Support | Live chat, Phone, Docs · 24/7 | Live chat, Phone, Docs · 24/7 |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Fasthosts VPS 0/2 · Bluehost VPS 0/2 | ||
| Managed option | Not published | Not published |
| Hourly billing | Not published | Not published |
| Specs | ||
| vCPU | 4 (best) | 2 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| NVMe storage | Not published | Not published |
| Included bandwidth | Not published | 2 TB/mo |
| Server locations | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Fasthosts VPS provides cloud-based virtual private servers for websites, applications, development environments and online services. Each tier includes dedicated virtual resources, NVMe storage, 1 Gbit/s bandwidth and full root access.… Read the review → |
Bluehost VPS provides managed virtual private servers for websites and applications that need dedicated CPU, memory and storage beyond shared hosting. It suits growing sites, developers and businesses that want isolated server resources… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Fasthosts VPS — where it wins
- NVMe storage paired with 1 Gbit/s bandwidth
- Linux or Windows Server choices with full root access
- Scalable tiers, Cloud Panel and 24/7 support
Where it doesn't
- VPS contracts have a minimum 12-month period
- Self-managed service requires your own server administration
- Plesk and Acronis backups are optional add-ons
Bluehost VPS — where it wins
- Dedicated virtual CPU and RAM allocations
- Root access plus a web hosting control panel
- 24/7 support by chat and phone, with documentation
Where it doesn't
- Uses SSD storage rather than NVMe
- No free plan
- Requires Linux server administration for root-level control
- Fasthosts VPS8.8/10 · Paid
Flexible NVMe VPS tiers with root access, 1 Gbit/s bandwidth and 24/7 support.
Visit FasthostsFull verdict → - Bluehost VPS6.7/10 · Paid
A managed VPS for websites, with dedicated resources and SSD storage.
Visit BluehostFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Fasthosts VPS vs TransIP VPS
- Fasthosts VPS vs InMotion Hosting VPS
- Fasthosts VPS vs IONOS VPS
- Fasthosts VPS vs AlphaVPS NVMe VPS
- Fasthosts VPS vs KnownHost NVMe VPS
- Fasthosts VPS vs Contabo VPS
- TransIP VPS vs Bluehost VPS
- InMotion Hosting VPS vs Bluehost VPS
All NVMe VPS hosting comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update