Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · NVMe VPS Hosting

Antihost vs Fasthosts VPS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Antihost #1 in NVMe VPS Hosting 9.7/10 Paid ✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Antihost
Fasthosts VPS #2 in NVMe VPS Hosting 9.2/10 Paid ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Fasthosts

Antihost leads on 0 checks, Fasthosts VPS on 2, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAntihost · 9.7/10
  • Most featuresAntihost · 1 of 2

Antihost scores higher on our rubric for nvme vps hosting: 9.7 against 9.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.

Fasthosts VPS leads on vcpu: 4 versus 1. Fasthosts VPS leads on ram: 4 GB versus 2 GB.

Antihost is the better fit for docker, bots and self-hosted apps on a Linux VPS. Fasthosts VPS is the better fit for established NVMe VPS with broad OS support.

  • Antihost fits best

    Docker, bots and self-hosted apps on a Linux VPS

  • Fasthosts VPS fits best

    Established NVMe VPS with broad OS support

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Antihost 9.7/10 Visit ↗ Fasthosts VPS 9.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.7 9.2
Ranking #1 in NVMe VPS Hosting #2 in NVMe VPS Hosting
Best for Docker, bots and self-hosted apps on a Linux VPS Established NVMe VPS with broad OS support
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $2.99/mo —
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Features Antihost 1/2 · Fasthosts VPS 0/2
Managed option ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Hourly billing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
vCPU 1 4 (best)
RAM 2 GB 4 GB (best)
NVMe storage 30 GB Not checked yet
Included bandwidth Not checked yet Not checked yet
Server locations 6 Not checked yet
Our review
Pros —
  • NVMe storage paired with 1 Gbit/s bandwidth
  • Linux or Windows Server choices with full root access
  • Scalable tiers, Cloud Panel and 24/7 support
Cons —
  • VPS contracts have a minimum 12-month period
  • Self-managed service requires your own server administration
  • Plesk and Acronis backups are optional add-ons
Our verdict

—

Read the review →

Fasthosts VPS provides cloud-based virtual private servers for websites, applications, development environments and online services. Each tier includes dedicated virtual resources, NVMe storage, 1 Gbit/s bandwidth and full root access.…

Read the review →
  1. AntihostNVMe VPS Hosting 9.7Paid
  2. Fasthosts VPSNVMe VPS Hosting 9.2Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Fasthosts VPS — where it wins

    • NVMe storage paired with 1 Gbit/s bandwidth
    • Linux or Windows Server choices with full root access
    • Scalable tiers, Cloud Panel and 24/7 support

    Where it doesn't

    • VPS contracts have a minimum 12-month period
    • Self-managed service requires your own server administration
    • Plesk and Acronis backups are optional add-ons

More comparisons

All NVMe VPS hosting comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update