Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Reverse Proxy Software

Envoy Proxy vs Skipper

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Envoy Proxy #9 in Reverse Proxy Software 8.1/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Envoy Proxy
Skipper #10 in Reverse Proxy Software 7.9/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Skipper

Envoy Proxy leads on 0 checks, Skipper on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreEnvoy Proxy · 8.1/10
  • Free planonly Envoy Proxy

Envoy Proxy scores higher on our rubric for reverse proxy software: 8.1 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #9 and #10.

Envoy Proxy is the better fit for advanced proxying and service-mesh workloads. Skipper is the better fit for kubernetes routing with advanced controls.

  • Envoy Proxy fits best

    Advanced proxying and service-mesh workloads

  • Skipper fits best

    Kubernetes routing with advanced controls

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Envoy Proxy 8.1/10 Visit ↗ Skipper 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.1 7.9
Ranking #9 in Reverse Proxy Software #10 in Reverse Proxy Software
Best for Advanced proxying and service-mesh workloads Kubernetes routing with advanced controls
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Linux, Windows, macOS
Support Community, Docs Docs, Community
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Envoy Proxy 4/5 · Skipper 4/5
TLS termination ✓ ✓
Web application firewall Not checked yet Not checked yet
Response caching ✓ ✓
WebSocket support ✓ ✓
Rate limiting ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Self-hosted Self-hosted
Configuration method Both Both
Our review
Pros
  • Supports HTTP, HTTP/2, HTTP/3, gRPC, and WebSockets
  • Combines routing, rate limiting, retries, circuit breaking, and health checks
  • Offers both static configuration and dynamic xDS APIs
  • Predicate-based routing across paths, methods, hosts, headers and cookies
  • Cluster-wide rate limiting, caching, mTLS and circuit breakers
  • Runs standalone or as a Kubernetes Ingress controller
Cons
  • Self-managed deployment requires operational ownership
  • The cache filter is work-in-progress in some versioned API documentation
  • Its extensive configuration may exceed simpler proxying needs
  • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure ownership
  • WebSocket support is documented as experimental
  • Its extensive controls may exceed simpler routing needs
Our verdict

Envoy Proxy is open-source Layer 7 proxy software for modern service-oriented architectures. It can run as an edge proxy, service-mesh data plane, or sidecar alongside application servers. Self-managed deployments are supported on Windows,…

Read the review →

Skipper is an open-source HTTP router and reverse proxy for service composition. It is designed for infrastructure teams operating self-hosted proxy and ingress deployments, either as a standalone proxy or as a Kubernetes Ingress…

Read the review →
  1. Envoy ProxyReverse Proxy Software 8.1Free plan
  2. SkipperReverse Proxy Software 7.9Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Envoy Proxy — where it wins

    • Supports HTTP, HTTP/2, HTTP/3, gRPC, and WebSockets
    • Combines routing, rate limiting, retries, circuit breaking, and health checks
    • Offers both static configuration and dynamic xDS APIs

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-managed deployment requires operational ownership
    • The cache filter is work-in-progress in some versioned API documentation
    • Its extensive configuration may exceed simpler proxying needs
  • Skipper — where it wins

    • Predicate-based routing across paths, methods, hosts, headers and cookies
    • Cluster-wide rate limiting, caching, mTLS and circuit breakers
    • Runs standalone or as a Kubernetes Ingress controller

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure ownership
    • WebSocket support is documented as experimental
    • Its extensive controls may exceed simpler routing needs

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update