Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Software Packaging Tools

Electron Forge vs Inno Setup

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Electron Forge #5 in Software Packaging Tools 8.7/10 Open source ✓ 3 of 5 features Visit Electron Forge
Inno Setup #7 in Software Packaging Tools 8.5/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Inno Setup

Electron Forge leads on 0 checks, Inno Setup on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreElectron Forge · 8.7/10
  • Most featuresInno Setup · 4 of 5

Electron Forge scores higher on our rubric for software packaging tools: 8.7 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

Electron Forge is the better fit for electron teams needing packaging and publishing. Inno Setup is the better fit for mature free Windows EXE installers.

  • Electron Forge fits best

    Electron teams needing packaging and publishing

  • Inno Setup fits best

    Mature free Windows EXE installers

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Electron Forge 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Inno Setup 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.5
Ranking #5 in Software Packaging Tools #7 in Software Packaging Tools
Best for Electron teams needing packaging and publishing Mature free Windows EXE installers
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Open source Free
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Desktop
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Windows
Support Docs, Community Community
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Electron Forge 3/5 · Inno Setup 4/5
Command-line packaging ✓ ✓
Silent installation Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Auto-update support ✓ ✓
Delta updates Not checked yet Not checked yet
CI/CD integration ✓ ✓
Specs
Target platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Windows
Output formats Squirrel.Windows, ZIP, DEB, RPM, DMG, AppX, Flatpak EXE installer
Our review
Pros
  • Packages Windows, macOS, and Linux applications
  • Supports signing, macOS notarization, publishing, and updates
  • Open-source CLI with makers, hooks, plugins, and CI integrations
  • Builds single-EXE installers for Windows x64 and Arm64 applications
  • Combines IDE, command-line builds, scripting and silent installation modes
  • Supports compression, signing, encryption, multilingual installs and uninstallers
Cons
  • Centered on Electron rather than general desktop packaging
  • Automatic updates require application-level configuration
  • macOS automatic updates require a signed application
  • Focused on Windows rather than cross-platform packaging
  • Advanced customization depends on Pascal scripting and preprocessor knowledge
  • Commercial plans separate licensing and update terms by organization type
Our verdict

Electron Forge is an open-source development tool for creating, packaging, signing, publishing, and updating Electron applications. It is designed for developers and teams distributing desktop software across Windows, macOS, and Linux.…

Read the review →

Inno Setup is an open-source Windows installation builder for developers and organizations distributing applications to end users. It creates EXE installers for 32-bit, 64-bit and Arm64 applications, with administrative and…

Read the review →
  1. Electron ForgeSoftware Packaging Tools 8.7Open source
  2. Inno SetupSoftware Packaging Tools 8.5Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Electron Forge — where it wins

    • Packages Windows, macOS, and Linux applications
    • Supports signing, macOS notarization, publishing, and updates
    • Open-source CLI with makers, hooks, plugins, and CI integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Centered on Electron rather than general desktop packaging
    • Automatic updates require application-level configuration
    • macOS automatic updates require a signed application
  • Inno Setup — where it wins

    • Builds single-EXE installers for Windows x64 and Arm64 applications
    • Combines IDE, command-line builds, scripting and silent installation modes
    • Supports compression, signing, encryption, multilingual installs and uninstallers

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on Windows rather than cross-platform packaging
    • Advanced customization depends on Pascal scripting and preprocessor knowledge
    • Commercial plans separate licensing and update terms by organization type

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update