Head-to-head · Disk Benchmark Software
DiskSpd vs Modern FS Benchmark
DiskSpd leads on 0 checks, Modern FS Benchmark on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreDiskSpd · 7.8/10
- Free planboth
DiskSpd scores higher on our rubric for disk benchmark software: 7.8 against 7.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #6.
DiskSpd is the better fit for free Windows low-level benchmarking. Modern FS Benchmark is the better fit for advanced Linux filesystem evaluation.
- DiskSpd fits best
Free Windows low-level benchmarking
- Modern FS Benchmark fits best
Advanced Linux filesystem evaluation
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | DiskSpd 7.8/10 Visit ↗ | Modern FS Benchmark 7.7/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.8 | 7.7 |
| Ranking | #5 in Disk Benchmark Software | #6 in Disk Benchmark Software |
| Best for | Free Windows low-level benchmarking | Advanced Linux filesystem evaluation |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Windows | Linux |
| Support | Docs | Community, Docs |
| Built for | Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features DiskSpd 5/5 · Modern FS Benchmark 5/5 | ||
| Random I/O tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Sequential tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| IOPS measurement | ✓ | ✓ |
| Latency measurement | ✓ | ✓ |
| Command-line interface | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Supported platforms | Windows | Linux |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | DiskSpd is Microsoft’s command-line storage load generator and performance testing tool for Windows. It is intended for technical users who need configurable benchmarks for regular files, partitions, or physical devices. Workloads can be… Read the review → |
Modern FS Benchmark is an open-source Linux benchmark suite for comparing copy-on-write and classic filesystem stacks. It is designed for engineers evaluating btrfs, ZFS, bcachefs, ext4, and XFS across single-device, redundant, encrypted,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
DiskSpd — where it wins
- Configures random and sequential workloads in detail
- Measures IOPS, latency percentiles, and interval statistics
- Tests files, partitions, and physical devices
Where it doesn't
- Windows is the primary supported platform
- Command-line operation requires technical familiarity
- Results are focused on benchmarking rather than visual reporting
Modern FS Benchmark — where it wins
- Tests redundancy, snapshots, compression, rebuilds, and recovery
- Measures random and sequential I/O, IOPS, latency, and tail behavior
- Runs in GitHub Actions or on real hardware with JSON and dashboards
Where it doesn't
- Linux-only platform support
- Requires filesystem and hardware benchmarking expertise
- Focused on filesystem evaluation rather than general disk testing
- DiskSpd7.8/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source Windows tool for configurable low-level disk benchmarks.
Visit DiskSpdFull verdict → - Modern FS Benchmark7.7/10 · Free plan
A deep Linux filesystem benchmark suite for repeatable performance and recovery comparisons.
Visit siteFull verdict →
More comparisons
- CrystalDiskMark vs DiskSpd
- CrystalDiskMark vs Modern FS Benchmark
- fio vs DiskSpd
- fio vs Modern FS Benchmark
- HD Tune Pro vs DiskSpd
- HD Tune Pro vs Modern FS Benchmark
- AJA System Test vs DiskSpd
- AJA System Test vs Modern FS Benchmark
All disk benchmark software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update

