Head-to-head · Disk Benchmark Software
CrystalDiskMark vs DiskSpd
CrystalDiskMark leads on 0 checks, DiskSpd on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreCrystalDiskMark · 9.0/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresDiskSpd · 5 of 5
CrystalDiskMark scores higher on our rubric for disk benchmark software: 9.0 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #5.
CrystalDiskMark is the better fit for easy Windows SSD and disk testing. DiskSpd is the better fit for free Windows low-level benchmarking.
- CrystalDiskMark fits best
Easy Windows SSD and disk testing
- DiskSpd fits best
Free Windows low-level benchmarking
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | CrystalDiskMark 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | DiskSpd 7.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 7.8 |
| Ranking | #1 in Disk Benchmark Software | #5 in Disk Benchmark Software |
| Best for | Easy Windows SSD and disk testing | Free Windows low-level benchmarking |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows |
| Built for | Solo, Small business | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features CrystalDiskMark 0/5 · DiskSpd 5/5 | ||
| Random I/O tests | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Sequential tests | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| IOPS measurement | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Latency measurement | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Command-line interface | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Specs | ||
| Supported platforms | Not checked yet | Windows |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | CrystalDiskMark is an open-source Windows storage benchmark for measuring sequential, random, read, write, and mixed disk performance. It suits users comparing SSDs, checking drive behavior, or documenting storage results. You choose the… Read the review → |
DiskSpd is Microsoft’s command-line storage load generator and performance testing tool for Windows. It is intended for technical users who need configurable benchmarks for regular files, partitions, or physical devices. Workloads can be… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
CrystalDiskMark — where it wins
- Tests sequential, random, read, write, and mixed performance.
- Shows MB/s, GB/s, IOPS, and average latency results.
- Exports results as text or PNG, JPEG, and BMP images.
Where it doesn't
- Windows-only software.
- The Microsoft Store edition costs $9.99 one-time.
- Its many settings may be more than casual users need.
DiskSpd — where it wins
- Configures random and sequential workloads in detail
- Measures IOPS, latency percentiles, and interval statistics
- Tests files, partitions, and physical devices
Where it doesn't
- Windows is the primary supported platform
- Command-line operation requires technical familiarity
- Results are focused on benchmarking rather than visual reporting
- CrystalDiskMark9.0/10 · Free plan
A configurable Windows disk benchmark with detailed speed, IOPS, and latency results.
Get CrystalDiskMarkFull verdict → - DiskSpd7.8/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source Windows tool for configurable low-level disk benchmarks.
Visit DiskSpdFull verdict →
More comparisons
- CrystalDiskMark vs fio
- CrystalDiskMark vs HD Tune Pro
- CrystalDiskMark vs AJA System Test
- CrystalDiskMark vs Modern FS Benchmark
- CrystalDiskMark vs Filebench
- CrystalDiskMark vs AS SSD Benchmark
- fio vs DiskSpd
- HD Tune Pro vs DiskSpd
All disk benchmark software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update

