Head-to-head · IaC Security Scanners
DeepSource vs TFLint
DeepSource leads on 0 checks, TFLint on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreDeepSource · 8.3/10
- Free planboth
DeepSource scores higher on our rubric for iac security scanners: 8.3 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.
DeepSource is the better fit for teams combining IaC and code security. TFLint is the better fit for terraform linting and provider best practices.
- DeepSource fits best
Teams combining IaC and code security
- TFLint fits best
Terraform linting and provider best practices
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | DeepSource 8.3/10 Visit ↗ | TFLint 7.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.3 | 7.8 |
| Ranking | #5 in IaC Security Scanners | #8 in IaC Security Scanners |
| Best for | Teams combining IaC and code security | Terraform linting and provider best practices |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free |
| Starting price | $24/user/mo | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Self-hosted, Desktop |
| Platforms | Web | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Email, Tickets, Docs | Docs, Community |
| Integrations | 8 integrations | 2 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features DeepSource 0/5 · TFLint 0/5 | ||
| Custom policies | Not published | Not published |
| CI/PR integration | Not published | Not published |
| Fix suggestions | Not published | Not published |
| Drift detection | Not published | Not published |
| Open-source option | Not published | Not published |
| Specs | ||
| IaC frameworks | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | DeepSource brings code review and application-security checks together for software teams that want infrastructure-as-code findings in the same workflow as code issues. It reviews Dockerfiles, Terraform, and Ansible, alongside static… Read the review → |
TFLint is a command-line linter for developers and infrastructure teams maintaining Terraform configurations. It checks syntax and semantics, flags deprecated syntax and unused declarations, and can identify invalid resource settings and… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
DeepSource — where it wins
- Reviews Dockerfiles, Terraform, and Ansible alongside application code.
- Scans pull requests for secrets and dependency vulnerabilities.
- Connects with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps.
Where it doesn't
- Secrets detection is limited to Team and Enterprise plans.
- Team costs $30 per user monthly or $24 with annual billing.
- The Individual plan's repository limits are not stated.
TFLint — where it wins
- Checks Terraform syntax, semantics, deprecated syntax, and unused declarations.
- Adds AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud rules through a plugin-based architecture.
- Offers JSON, Checkstyle, JUnit, compact, and SARIF output plus automatic fixing.
Where it doesn't
- Scans Terraform rather than multiple infrastructure-as-code languages.
- Does not provide configuration compliance or provisioning and deployed tests.
- Support is through documentation and community channels.
- DeepSource8.3/10 · Free plan · paid from $24/user/mo (annual) · 14-day trial
Combines IaC checks with code, secrets, and dependency scanning in pull requests.
Visit DeepSourceFull verdict → - TFLint7.8/10 · Free plan
A free, local Terraform linter with cloud-provider rules, plugins, and autofixing.
Visit TFLintFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Snyk IaC vs DeepSource
- Snyk IaC vs TFLint
- KICS vs DeepSource
- KICS vs TFLint
- Checkov vs DeepSource
- Checkov vs TFLint
- Pulumi vs DeepSource
- Pulumi vs TFLint
All IaC security scanners comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update




