Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Test Flakiness Management Software

Datadog Test Optimization vs Develocity

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Datadog Test Optimization #6 in Test Flakiness Management Software 8.7/10 14-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Datadog
Develocity #7 in Test Flakiness Management Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Develocity

Datadog Test Optimization leads on 0 checks, Develocity on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreDatadog Test Optimization · 8.7/10
  • Free trialboth

Datadog Test Optimization scores higher on our rubric for test flakiness management software: 8.7 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #7.

Datadog Test Optimization is the better fit for datadog users needing affordable flake controls. Develocity is the better fit for build engineering teams with complex build systems.

  • Datadog Test Optimization fits best

    Datadog users needing affordable flake controls

  • Develocity fits best

    Build engineering teams with complex build systems

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Datadog Test Optimization 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Develocity 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.6
Ranking #6 in Test Flakiness Management Software #7 in Test Flakiness Management Software
Best for Datadog users needing affordable flake controls Build engineering teams with complex build systems
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $20/user/mo Pricing on request · 30-day trial
Free plan — —
Free trial 14 days 30 days
Free trial length 14 days 30 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Live chat, Email, Community, Docs Email, Phone, Docs
Integrations 4 integrations 16 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Datadog Test Optimization 4/5 · Develocity 4/5
Flake detection ✓ ✓
Quarantine workflow ✓ ✓
Failure clustering Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Rerun policies ✓ ✓
Issue tracker links ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Supported frameworks JUnit 4, JUnit 5, TestNG, Spock, Cucumber, Karate, Scalatest, Scala MUnit, Scala Weaver, Jest, Mocha, Cypress, Playwright, Vitest, RSpec, Minitest, pytest JUnit 4, JUnit 5, Spock, TestNG, Maven Surefire/Failsafe, Jest, Mocha, Cypress, pytest
Our review
Pros
  • Automatic detection, quarantine policies, retries, and early flake detection
  • Traces, stack traces, and Test Impact Analysis support failure investigation
  • Integrates with Jira, GitHub, GitLab, and Azure DevOps
  • Detects flaky tests within and across builds using retry outcomes and shared inputs
  • Quarantines known-flaky tests and supports configurable retry limits
  • Build Scans include outcomes, stack traces, retry output, and timelines
Cons
  • There is no free plan for teams wanting a no-cost starting point
  • Annual pricing is tied to active Git committers
  • Monthly on-demand pricing is higher at $29 per committer
  • Requires contact with sales for pricing
  • No free plan is available
  • Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams with simple build systems
Our verdict

Datadog Test Optimization is a CI test visibility and flaky-test management product for software and platform engineering teams. It instruments and traces tests to show test health, performance, reliability, failures, and flakiness. Teams…

Read the review →

Develocity is a software delivery platform for engineering and platform teams that need detailed visibility into build and test behavior. It captures build and test telemetry, provides Build Scans and analytics, detects flaky tests within…

Read the review →
  1. Datadog Test OptimizationTest Flakiness Management Software 8.714-day trial
  2. DevelocityTest Flakiness Management Software 8.6Pricing on request · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Datadog Test Optimization — where it wins

    • Automatic detection, quarantine policies, retries, and early flake detection
    • Traces, stack traces, and Test Impact Analysis support failure investigation
    • Integrates with Jira, GitHub, GitLab, and Azure DevOps

    Where it doesn't

    • There is no free plan for teams wanting a no-cost starting point
    • Annual pricing is tied to active Git committers
    • Monthly on-demand pricing is higher at $29 per committer
  • Develocity — where it wins

    • Detects flaky tests within and across builds using retry outcomes and shared inputs
    • Quarantines known-flaky tests and supports configurable retry limits
    • Build Scans include outcomes, stack traces, retry output, and timelines

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires contact with sales for pricing
    • No free plan is available
    • Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams with simple build systems
  • Datadog Test Optimization8.7/10 · 14-day trial

    A focused Datadog option for detecting, governing, and investigating flaky CI tests.

    Visit DatadogFull verdict →
  • Develocity8.6/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A deep flakiness-management layer for complex builds, with commercial pricing and no free plan.

    Visit DevelocityFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update